Views on public participation: a gendered analysis on local development

As South Africa moves towards democratic consolidation and deepening of democratic spaces, wide-based participation in decision making and planning at local levels not only becomes desirable but also critical from a deliberative perspective. Various processes and mechanisms implemented by Government seem not to have the desired outcome of facilitating effective participation, as evidenced by the increasing levels of local participation in alternate or preferred spaces. Furthermore, the reality of increasing inequality reflected in macro socio-economic trends and national development indicators, requires disaggregation for understanding local participatory processes and its impact on development. Inclusive planning at a local level thus implicitly implies that expressions and views need to be measured, interpreted, and applied within specific contexts, to address relevance and priority setting within the planning framework. This paper draws on empirical evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council since 2003 on the public's attitudes, beliefs, behavior patterns and values on selected issues, with specific inquiry into participatory issues in the 2009 survey. Findings on attitudes towards planning processes and mechanisms; attention to political news; views on actual participation in government decision making and degree of satisfaction on consultative efforts are gendered in that men and women have different views on these and other social issues, resulting from differing experiences. The impact of these findings on local development is explored thus from a gendered lens, aiming to deepen understanding of the causes of social inequality.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/29389382
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Views on public participation: a gendered analysis on local development

Figshare
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Views on public participation: a gendered analysis on local development

article en

Abstract

As South Africa moves towards democratic consolidation and deepening of democratic spaces, wide-based participation in decision making and planning at local levels not only becomes desirable but also critical from a deliberative perspective. Various processes and mechanisms implemented by Government seem not to have the desired outcome of facilitating effective participation, as evidenced by the increasing levels of local participation in alternate or preferred spaces. Furthermore, the reality of increasing inequality reflected in macro socio-economic trends and national development indicators, requires disaggregation for understanding local participatory processes and its impact on development. Inclusive planning at a local level thus implicitly implies that expressions and views need to be measured, interpreted, and applied within specific contexts, to address relevance and priority setting within the planning framework. This paper draws on empirical evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council since 2003 on the public's attitudes, beliefs, behavior patterns and values on selected issues, with specific inquiry into participatory issues in the 2009 survey. Findings on attitudes towards planning processes and mechanisms; attention to political news; views on actual participation in government decision making and degree of satisfaction on consultative efforts are gendered in that men and women have different views on these and other social issues, resulting from differing experiences. The impact of these findings on local development is explored thus from a gendered lens, aiming to deepen understanding of the causes of social inequality.

Figshare
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Views on public participation: a gendered analysis on local development · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS