TREND statement checklist.

<div><p>Background</p><p>Family physicians in Canada’s universal healthcare system often manage low back pain patients using interventions not recommended in clinical guidelines, such as pharmaceuticals, imaging and spinal injections, while guideline-based treatments like education and exercise remain unfunded. The Alberta Back Care pathway was developed to address this gap, offering funded, evidence-based care for low back pain patients in 5 streams (acute, sub-acute, chronic, chronic non-responsive and stable radiculopathy).</p><p>Objective</p><p>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the pathway in two urban Primary Care Networks in Alberta, Canada.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Each of the 5 pathway streams provided physicians with information scripts, no-cost interventions (pharmaceuticals and otherwise) and interventions to avoid. From April 2021 to November 2023, the RE-AIM framework was used to assess implementation feasibility of the pathway.</p><p>Results</p><p>For the RE-AIM dimension of reach, 25% (n = 41/162) of eligible family physicians in Primary Care Network “A” and 12% (n = 26/221) in Primary Care Network “B” enrolled in the study. Over half of enrolled physicians (n = 21/41 and 21/26) referred at least one patient with most referrals to the GLA:D Back program for chronic low back pain stream (93% in network “A” and 88% in network “B”). Implementation, evaluated as the proportion of referrals by physician compared to their total low back pain caseload, was low (> 0–10% referred) for 52% (n = 11/21) of physicians in network “A”, and medium-low (10–25% referred) for 52% (n = 11/21) of physicians in network “B”. The number of pathway-appropriate patients in each physician’s caseload was unknown. Maintenance at 12 months was 56% (n = 10/18) in network “A” and 39% (n = 7/18) in network “B”.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The Alberta Back Care pathway was feasible to implement during the pandemic and primarily serving patients with chronic low back pain by providing access to a guideline-based education and exercise group program (GLA:D Back).</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312737.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TREND statement checklist.

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

TREND statement checklist.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Background</p><p>Family physicians in Canada’s universal healthcare system often manage low back pain patients using interventions not recommended in clinical guidelines, such as pharmaceuticals, imaging and spinal injections, while guideline-based treatments like education and exercise remain unfunded. The Alberta Back Care pathway was developed to address this gap, offering funded, evidence-based care for low back pain patients in 5 streams (acute, sub-acute, chronic, chronic non-responsive and stable radiculopathy).</p><p>Objective</p><p>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the pathway in two urban Primary Care Networks in Alberta, Canada.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Each of the 5 pathway streams provided physicians with information scripts, no-cost interventions (pharmaceuticals and otherwise) and interventions to avoid. From April 2021 to November 2023, the RE-AIM framework was used to assess implementation feasibility of the pathway.</p><p>Results</p><p>For the RE-AIM dimension of reach, 25% (n = 41/162) of eligible family physicians in Primary Care Network “A” and 12% (n = 26/221) in Primary Care Network “B” enrolled in the study. Over half of enrolled physicians (n = 21/41 and 21/26) referred at least one patient with most referrals to the GLA:D Back program for chronic low back pain stream (93% in network “A” and 88% in network “B”). Implementation, evaluated as the proportion of referrals by physician compared to their total low back pain caseload, was low (> 0–10% referred) for 52% (n = 11/21) of physicians in network “A”, and medium-low (10–25% referred) for 52% (n = 11/21) of physicians in network “B”. The number of pathway-appropriate patients in each physician’s caseload was unknown. Maintenance at 12 months was 56% (n = 10/18) in network “A” and 39% (n = 7/18) in network “B”.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The Alberta Back Care pathway was feasible to implement during the pandemic and primarily serving patients with chronic low back pain by providing access to a guideline-based education and exercise group program (GLA:D Back).</p></div>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.