Gain function fit.

<p>Left, multiplicative and additive gain function predictions plotted together with the original somatic firing rate for the low Δ<i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> condition as a function of stimulus orientation relative to target orientation. The ξ values denote the fit parameter that describes the firing rate change either as a gain coefficient or as a gain constant for the multiplicative (ξ<sub>mul</sub>) and additive (ξ<sub>add</sub>) gain transformation, respectively. Predictions were generated by either adding ξ<sub>add</sub> or multiplying ξ<sub>mul</sub> to the tuning curve with no <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> change. Errors were assumed Gaussian and reported as ± standard deviations. Right, actual multiplicative and additive gain function fits plotted with the simulated somatic firing rate data with no <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> shift (firing rate before) against low <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> shift (firing rate after). The original firing rate data was plotted as ± standard deviations on each axis. To fit the data, we have only considered data with nonzero standard deviation.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002935.s010
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gain function fit.

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Gain function fit.

article en

Abstract

<p>Left, multiplicative and additive gain function predictions plotted together with the original somatic firing rate for the low Δ<i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> condition as a function of stimulus orientation relative to target orientation. The ξ values denote the fit parameter that describes the firing rate change either as a gain coefficient or as a gain constant for the multiplicative (ξ<sub>mul</sub>) and additive (ξ<sub>add</sub>) gain transformation, respectively. Predictions were generated by either adding ξ<sub>add</sub> or multiplying ξ<sub>mul</sub> to the tuning curve with no <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> change. Errors were assumed Gaussian and reported as ± standard deviations. Right, actual multiplicative and additive gain function fits plotted with the simulated somatic firing rate data with no <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> shift (firing rate before) against low <i>E</i><sub>K</sub><sup>+</sup> shift (firing rate after). The original firing rate data was plotted as ± standard deviations on each axis. To fit the data, we have only considered data with nonzero standard deviation.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.