Development of a conceptual framework and indicator system for evaluating basic public health service projects: a literature review and expert consultation study

ObjectiveTo develop a conceptual framework and a system of indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health services projects, and to provide scientific approaches and tools for such evaluations. MethodsGuided by the health output, and considering the characteristics of public health services and the content of China′s basic public health service projects, as well as relevant theoretical models, we elaborated on the basic dimensions of evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health service projects and constructed a conceptual framework based on the elaboration between 2021 and 2022. Through in-depth individual interviews, Delphi expert consultations, and expert panels, an indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of a basic public health services project was developed and the weights of the indicators were determined using the analytical hierarchy process. ResultsThe conceptual framework developed to evaluate the effectiveness of China′s basic public health projects includes five aspects: improving population health literacy, improving health status, reducing environmental risk factors, innovating and improving related health policies and systems, and increasing supply and demand satisfaction. The results of the expert consultation showed that the Delphi experts′ familiarity coefficient was 0.92, the judgment coefficient was 0.88, and the authority coefficient was 0.9. Ultimately, the study created an indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health projects that includes 5 primary dimensions, 18 secondary indicators, and 52 tertiary indicators. Data relevant to the indicators could be collected through health information monitoring systems and online surveys. Regarding the weights of the primary dimensions, the highest weight was assigned to health status (0.448 2), followed by health literacy (0.205 8). ConclusionThe conceptual framework and indicator system for evaluating basic public health service projects constructed in this study emphasize a value-oriented approach to health outcomes with high accuracy and reliability. This system fully utilizes available health information monitoring data, demonstrates good operability, and comprehensively covers evaluation contents, positioning it as a scientific tool for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health service projects.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws1143864
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a conceptual framework and indicator system for evaluating basic public health service projects: a literature review and expert consultation study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Development of a conceptual framework and indicator system for evaluating basic public health service projects: a literature review and expert consultation study

article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop a conceptual framework and a system of indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health services projects, and to provide scientific approaches and tools for such evaluations. MethodsGuided by the health output, and considering the characteristics of public health services and the content of China′s basic public health service projects, as well as relevant theoretical models, we elaborated on the basic dimensions of evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health service projects and constructed a conceptual framework based on the elaboration between 2021 and 2022. Through in-depth individual interviews, Delphi expert consultations, and expert panels, an indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of a basic public health services project was developed and the weights of the indicators were determined using the analytical hierarchy process. ResultsThe conceptual framework developed to evaluate the effectiveness of China′s basic public health projects includes five aspects: improving population health literacy, improving health status, reducing environmental risk factors, innovating and improving related health policies and systems, and increasing supply and demand satisfaction. The results of the expert consultation showed that the Delphi experts′ familiarity coefficient was 0.92, the judgment coefficient was 0.88, and the authority coefficient was 0.9. Ultimately, the study created an indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health projects that includes 5 primary dimensions, 18 secondary indicators, and 52 tertiary indicators. Data relevant to the indicators could be collected through health information monitoring systems and online surveys. Regarding the weights of the primary dimensions, the highest weight was assigned to health status (0.448 2), followed by health literacy (0.205 8). ConclusionThe conceptual framework and indicator system for evaluating basic public health service projects constructed in this study emphasize a value-oriented approach to health outcomes with high accuracy and reliability. This system fully utilizes available health information monitoring data, demonstrates good operability, and comprehensively covers evaluation contents, positioning it as a scientific tool for evaluating the effectiveness of basic public health service projects.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Soochow University (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.