Analysis and ToxicologicalEvaluation of NicotineDegradants and Impurities in Oral Tobacco Products: A Case Study of <i>on! PLUS</i> Nicotine Pouches

This study provides a comprehensive toxicological evaluation of seven nicotine degradants and impurities (e.g., myosmine, nornicotine, anatabine, anabasine, β-nicotyrine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide) in oral nicotine pouches. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and European Pharmacopeia (EP) limits, International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidance, and available toxicity data were considered during the evaluation. The toxicological weight of evidence supports that the levels of nornicotine, anabasine, β-nicotyrine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide do not pose health risks greater than nicotine and therefore do not increase the health risks of oral tobacco products such as nicotine pouches. However, myosmine and anatabine should be closely monitored against appropriate qualification thresholds due to their potential toxicological concerns. A robust UPLC–MS/MS analytical method was developed and validated for the accurate determination of the seven nicotine degradants and impurities in <i>on! PLUS</i> nicotine pouches. The method was utilized to assess the shelf life stability of nicotine in <i>on! PLUS</i> nicotine pouches over a 12-month period under ICH long-term storage conditions. Anabasine, β-nicotyrine, anatabine, and nornicotine were either not detected or found below the limit of quantitation over the course of the stability study. Myosmine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide were found to be 0.055, 0.015, and 1.32% of the target nicotine level, respectively.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00263.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and ToxicologicalEvaluation of NicotineDegradants and Impurities in Oral Tobacco Products: A Case Study of on! PLUS Nicotine Pouches

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Analysis and ToxicologicalEvaluation of NicotineDegradants and Impurities in Oral Tobacco Products: A Case Study of on! PLUS Nicotine Pouches

article en

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive toxicological evaluation of seven nicotine degradants and impurities (e.g., myosmine, nornicotine, anatabine, anabasine, β-nicotyrine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide) in oral nicotine pouches. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and European Pharmacopeia (EP) limits, International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidance, and available toxicity data were considered during the evaluation. The toxicological weight of evidence supports that the levels of nornicotine, anabasine, β-nicotyrine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide do not pose health risks greater than nicotine and therefore do not increase the health risks of oral tobacco products such as nicotine pouches. However, myosmine and anatabine should be closely monitored against appropriate qualification thresholds due to their potential toxicological concerns. A robust UPLC–MS/MS analytical method was developed and validated for the accurate determination of the seven nicotine degradants and impurities in <i>on! PLUS</i> nicotine pouches. The method was utilized to assess the shelf life stability of nicotine in <i>on! PLUS</i> nicotine pouches over a 12-month period under ICH long-term storage conditions. Anabasine, β-nicotyrine, anatabine, and nornicotine were either not detected or found below the limit of quantitation over the course of the stability study. Myosmine, cotinine, and nicotine-<i>N</i>′-oxide were found to be 0.055, 0.015, and 1.32% of the target nicotine level, respectively.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.