Food Portion Size Estimation for Developing a Healthy Eating Index: Influence of Unit Count and Energy Density

\nEstimating food consumption is often influenced by the intricate cognitive processes involved in determining portion sizes. Understanding the factors influencing these processes can enhance the accuracy of dietary assessments. This study aims to evaluate the ability of participants to estimate portion sizes of common foods and to identify estimation errors. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional approach involving 35 participants, who estimated the portions of various foods, measured in grams or milliliters, based on memory. The magnitude and direction of estimation errors were analyzed. Underestimation was defined as estimated quantities (EQ) less than 90% of the actual weighed quantity (WQ), while overestimation was defined as EQ greater than 110% of the WQ. Results: Only 15.59% of the estimates were considered accurate (approximately 10% of the actual weight). Animal proteins, vegetables, and sugars were the most frequently underestimated, while staple foods, vegetable proteins, fruits, vegetables, and fats/oils were the most commonly overestimated. Conclusion: This study revealed a low proportion of accurate food portion size estimates, with a tendency to overestimate low-energy foods and underestimate high-energy foods.\n

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413300006/pdf
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food Portion Size Estimation for Developing a Healthy Eating Index: Influence of Unit Count and Energy Density

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Food Portion Size Estimation for Developing a Healthy Eating Index: Influence of Unit Count and Energy Density

article en

Abstract

\nEstimating food consumption is often influenced by the intricate cognitive processes involved in determining portion sizes. Understanding the factors influencing these processes can enhance the accuracy of dietary assessments. This study aims to evaluate the ability of participants to estimate portion sizes of common foods and to identify estimation errors. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional approach involving 35 participants, who estimated the portions of various foods, measured in grams or milliliters, based on memory. The magnitude and direction of estimation errors were analyzed. Underestimation was defined as estimated quantities (EQ) less than 90% of the actual weighed quantity (WQ), while overestimation was defined as EQ greater than 110% of the WQ. Results: Only 15.59% of the estimates were considered accurate (approximately 10% of the actual weight). Animal proteins, vegetables, and sugars were the most frequently underestimated, while staple foods, vegetable proteins, fruits, vegetables, and fats/oils were the most commonly overestimated. Conclusion: This study revealed a low proportion of accurate food portion size estimates, with a tendency to overestimate low-energy foods and underestimate high-energy foods.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Universitas Diponegoro
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.