Au-delà de la répétition

This paper explores Gilles Deleuze’s critique of Sigmund Freud’s concept of repetition, particularly in the context of temporality, habit, and the unconscious. While psychoanalysis links the repetition compulsion to the search for pleasure, the tendency to repeat over and over again a past traumatic experience and, finally, on a deeper lever, the drive to return to an inanimate state, the account given by Deleuze in Difference and Repetition is quite different. On the one hand, repetition surely rules the process of psychic individuations but, on the other hand, it never refers to an empirical object or an actual experience – meaning that there is no habit which is repeated for the purpose of obtaining some pleasure, there is no past experience recurring in the present and, above all, the death drive does not correspond to the human need to go back to a purely material inanimate condition. This perspective allows Deleuze to reinterpret the unconscious as a dynamic force of questioning and problematization, rather than a mere repository of past experiences. This shifts the understanding of psychic life from one of static repetition to one of perpetual novelty and differentiation, challenging traditional psychoanalytic views and highlighting the continuous generation of newness in human desires and behaviors.

Publication Details

Journal
CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2036-542x/11062
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Au-delà de la répétition

CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Au-delà de la répétition

article en

Abstract

This paper explores Gilles Deleuze’s critique of Sigmund Freud’s concept of repetition, particularly in the context of temporality, habit, and the unconscious. While psychoanalysis links the repetition compulsion to the search for pleasure, the tendency to repeat over and over again a past traumatic experience and, finally, on a deeper lever, the drive to return to an inanimate state, the account given by Deleuze in Difference and Repetition is quite different. On the one hand, repetition surely rules the process of psychic individuations but, on the other hand, it never refers to an empirical object or an actual experience – meaning that there is no habit which is repeated for the purpose of obtaining some pleasure, there is no past experience recurring in the present and, above all, the death drive does not correspond to the human need to go back to a purely material inanimate condition. This perspective allows Deleuze to reinterpret the unconscious as a dynamic force of questioning and problematization, rather than a mere repository of past experiences. This shifts the understanding of psychic life from one of static repetition to one of perpetual novelty and differentiation, challenging traditional psychoanalytic views and highlighting the continuous generation of newness in human desires and behaviors.

CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.