Validating the clustering predictions of empirical models with the FLAMINGO simulations

Context. Mock galaxy catalogues are essential for correctly interpreting current and future generations of galaxy surveys. Despite their significance in galaxy formation and cosmology, little to no work has been done to validate the predictions of these mocks for high-order clustering statistics. Aims. We compare the predicting power of the latest generation of empirical models used in the creation of mock galaxy catalogues: a 13-parameter halo occupation distribution (HOD) and an extension of the SubHalo Abundance Matching technique (SHAMe). Methos. We built <ns0:monospace>GalaxyEmu-Planck</ns0:monospace>, an emulator that makes precise predictions for the two-point correlation function, galaxy-galaxy lensing (restricted to distances greater than 1 h−1 Mpc in order to avoid baryonic effects), and other high-order statistics resulting from the evaluation of SHAMe and HOD models. Results. We evaluated the precision of <ns0:monospace>GalaxyEmu-Planck</ns0:monospace> using two galaxy samples extracted from the FLAMINGO hydrodynamical simulation that mimic the properties of DESI-BGS and BOSS galaxies, finding that the emulator reproduces all the predicted statistics precisely. The HOD shows a comparable performance when fitting galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing. In contrast, the SHAMe model shows better predictions for higher-order statistics, especially regarding the galaxy assembly bias level. We also tested the performance of the models after removing some of their extensions, finding that we can withdraw two (out of 13) of the HOD parameters without a significant loss of performance. Conclusions. The results of this paper validate the current generation of empirical models as a way to reproduce galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and other high-order statistics. The excellent performance of the SHAMe model with a small number of free parameters suggests that it is a valid method to extract cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451671/pdf
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the clustering predictions of empirical models with the FLAMINGO simulations

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Validating the clustering predictions of empirical models with the FLAMINGO simulations

article en

Abstract

Context. Mock galaxy catalogues are essential for correctly interpreting current and future generations of galaxy surveys. Despite their significance in galaxy formation and cosmology, little to no work has been done to validate the predictions of these mocks for high-order clustering statistics. Aims. We compare the predicting power of the latest generation of empirical models used in the creation of mock galaxy catalogues: a 13-parameter halo occupation distribution (HOD) and an extension of the SubHalo Abundance Matching technique (SHAMe). Methos. We built <ns0:monospace>GalaxyEmu-Planck</ns0:monospace>, an emulator that makes precise predictions for the two-point correlation function, galaxy-galaxy lensing (restricted to distances greater than 1 h−1 Mpc in order to avoid baryonic effects), and other high-order statistics resulting from the evaluation of SHAMe and HOD models. Results. We evaluated the precision of <ns0:monospace>GalaxyEmu-Planck</ns0:monospace> using two galaxy samples extracted from the FLAMINGO hydrodynamical simulation that mimic the properties of DESI-BGS and BOSS galaxies, finding that the emulator reproduces all the predicted statistics precisely. The HOD shows a comparable performance when fitting galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing. In contrast, the SHAMe model shows better predictions for higher-order statistics, especially regarding the galaxy assembly bias level. We also tested the performance of the models after removing some of their extensions, finding that we can withdraw two (out of 13) of the HOD parameters without a significant loss of performance. Conclusions. The results of this paper validate the current generation of empirical models as a way to reproduce galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and other high-order statistics. The excellent performance of the SHAMe model with a small number of free parameters suggests that it is a valid method to extract cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Centres de Recerca de Catalunya, European Commission, Durham University, Generalitat de Catalunya, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Generalitat Valenciana, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Institut de Física d'Altes Energies, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Executive Agency, Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.