„Their most precious posession“? – Das chinesische Face als Marker kontingenter kultureller Differenzierung

Face is widely recognized as an important concept of social practice and communication in China. In contrast, the assumption of the existence of a “cultural character” as a singular entity – of which the “Chinese face” would be a cornerstone – is considered problematic due to the implications of essentializing and culturalizing determinism in anthropology. In this article, I argue that the concept of Face as a Chinese character trait added a culturalist level of description to tell apart the “other” that was often marked as inferior to the Westerners in the late 19th century. While phrases such as “losing face,” “saving face,” and “giving face” have since found their way into European languages as loan words from Chinese, Face continues to serve as a stereotype and emic concept for cultural difference. However, the use of Face as a marker does not necessarily hierarchize differences, it’s use is contingent. This article will show how Face has been associated with changing categories of difference and conceptualizations of China over time in both Western and Chinese discourse. The article thus combines historical research of differentiation processes with systematic considerations on the functioning of difference markers.

Publication Details

Journal
University Library Heidelberg
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11588/asien.2023.166/167.27353
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„Their most precious posession“? – Das chinesische Face als Marker kontingenter kultureller Differenzierung

University Library Heidelberg
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

„Their most precious posession“? – Das chinesische Face als Marker kontingenter kultureller Differenzierung

article en

Abstract

Face is widely recognized as an important concept of social practice and communication in China. In contrast, the assumption of the existence of a “cultural character” as a singular entity – of which the “Chinese face” would be a cornerstone – is considered problematic due to the implications of essentializing and culturalizing determinism in anthropology. In this article, I argue that the concept of Face as a Chinese character trait added a culturalist level of description to tell apart the “other” that was often marked as inferior to the Westerners in the late 19th century. While phrases such as “losing face,” “saving face,” and “giving face” have since found their way into European languages as loan words from Chinese, Face continues to serve as a stereotype and emic concept for cultural difference. However, the use of Face as a marker does not necessarily hierarchize differences, it’s use is contingent. This article will show how Face has been associated with changing categories of difference and conceptualizations of China over time in both Western and Chinese discourse. The article thus combines historical research of differentiation processes with systematic considerations on the functioning of difference markers.

University Library Heidelberg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

„Their most precious posession“? – Das chinesische Face als Marker kontingenter kultureller Differenzierung · University Library Heidelberg (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS