Metals in Wildfire\nSuppressants

Frequent and severe wildfires have led to increased application\nof fire suppression products (long-term fire retardants, water enhancers,\nand Class A foams) in the American West. While fire suppressing products\nused on wildfires must be approved by the U.S. Forest Service, portions\nof their formulations are trade secrets. Increased metals content\nin soils and surface waters at the wildland-urban interface has been\nobserved after wildfires but has primarily been attributed to ash\ndeposition or anthropogenic impact from nearby urban areas. In this\nstudy, metal concentrations in several fire suppression products (some\napproved by the U.S. Forest Service, and some marketed for consumer\nuse) were quantified to evaluate whether these products could contribute\nto increased metal concentrations observed in the environment postfire.\nLong-term fire retardants contained concentrations of toxic metals\n(V, Cr, Mn, Cu, As, Cd, Sb, Ba, Tl, and Pb) 4–2,880 times greater\nthan drinking water regulatory limits, and potentially greater than\nsome aquatic toxicity thresholds when released into the environment.\nWater enhancers and Class A foams contained some metals, but at lower\nconcentrations than fire retardants. Based on these concentrations\nand retardant application records, we estimate fire retardant application\nin the U.S. contributed approximately 380,000 kg of toxic metals to\nthe environment between 2009 and 2021.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00727.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metals in Wildfire\nSuppressants

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Metals in Wildfire\nSuppressants

article en

Abstract

Frequent and severe wildfires have led to increased application\nof fire suppression products (long-term fire retardants, water enhancers,\nand Class A foams) in the American West. While fire suppressing products\nused on wildfires must be approved by the U.S. Forest Service, portions\nof their formulations are trade secrets. Increased metals content\nin soils and surface waters at the wildland-urban interface has been\nobserved after wildfires but has primarily been attributed to ash\ndeposition or anthropogenic impact from nearby urban areas. In this\nstudy, metal concentrations in several fire suppression products (some\napproved by the U.S. Forest Service, and some marketed for consumer\nuse) were quantified to evaluate whether these products could contribute\nto increased metal concentrations observed in the environment postfire.\nLong-term fire retardants contained concentrations of toxic metals\n(V, Cr, Mn, Cu, As, Cd, Sb, Ba, Tl, and Pb) 4–2,880 times greater\nthan drinking water regulatory limits, and potentially greater than\nsome aquatic toxicity thresholds when released into the environment.\nWater enhancers and Class A foams contained some metals, but at lower\nconcentrations than fire retardants. Based on these concentrations\nand retardant application records, we estimate fire retardant application\nin the U.S. contributed approximately 380,000 kg of toxic metals to\nthe environment between 2009 and 2021.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.