Graph-Based Deep\nLearning Models for Thermodynamic\nProperty Prediction: The Interplay between Target Definition, Data\nDistribution, Featurization, and Model Architecture

In\nthis contribution, we examine the interplay between target definition,\ndata distribution, featurization approaches, and model architectures\non graph-based deep learning models for thermodynamic property prediction.\nThrough consideration of five curated data sets, exhibiting diversity\nin elemental composition, multiplicity, charge state, and size, we\nexamine the impact of each of these factors on model accuracy. We\nobserve that target definition, i.e., using formation instead of atomization\nenergy/enthalpy, is a decisive factor, and so is a careful selection\nof the featurization approach. Our attempts at directly modifying\nmodel architectures result in more modest, though not negligible,\naccuracy gains. Remarkably, we observe that molecule-level predictions\ntend to outperform atom-level increment predictions, in contrast to\nprevious findings. Overall, this work paves the way toward the development\nof robust graph-based thermodynamic model architectures with more\nuniversal capabilities, i.e., architectures that can reach excellent\naccuracy across data sets and compound domains.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02014.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graph-Based Deep\nLearning Models for Thermodynamic\nProperty Prediction: The Interplay between Target Definition, Data\nDistribution, Featurization, and Model Architecture

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Graph-Based Deep\nLearning Models for Thermodynamic\nProperty Prediction: The Interplay between Target Definition, Data\nDistribution, Featurization, and Model Architecture

article en

Abstract

In\nthis contribution, we examine the interplay between target definition,\ndata distribution, featurization approaches, and model architectures\non graph-based deep learning models for thermodynamic property prediction.\nThrough consideration of five curated data sets, exhibiting diversity\nin elemental composition, multiplicity, charge state, and size, we\nexamine the impact of each of these factors on model accuracy. We\nobserve that target definition, i.e., using formation instead of atomization\nenergy/enthalpy, is a decisive factor, and so is a careful selection\nof the featurization approach. Our attempts at directly modifying\nmodel architectures result in more modest, though not negligible,\naccuracy gains. Remarkably, we observe that molecule-level predictions\ntend to outperform atom-level increment predictions, in contrast to\nprevious findings. Overall, this work paves the way toward the development\nof robust graph-based thermodynamic model architectures with more\nuniversal capabilities, i.e., architectures that can reach excellent\naccuracy across data sets and compound domains.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Graph-Based Deep\nLearning Models for Thermodynamic\nProperty Prediction: The Interplay between Target Definition, Data\nDistribution, Featurization, and Model Architecture · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS