Primary and secondary source of energy in the superluminous supernova 2018ibb

\nWe examined a possible pair-instability origin for the superluminous supernova 2018ibb. As the base model, we used a non-rotating stellar model with an initial mass of 250 M⊙ at about 1/15 solar metallicity. We considered three versions of the model as input for radiative transfer simulations done with the S<sc>TELLA</sc> and A<sc>RTIS</sc> codes: with 25 M⊙ of 56Ni, with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni, and a chemically mixed case with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni. We present light curves and spectra in comparison to the observed data of SN 2018ibb, and conclude that the pair-instability supernova model with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni explains the broadband light curves reasonably well between −100 and 250 days around the peak. Our synthetic spectra have many similarities with the observed spectra. The luminosity excess in the light curves and the blue-flux excess in the spectra can be explained by an additional energy source, which may be an interaction of the supernova ejecta with circumstellar matter. We discuss possible mechanisms that could have caused the circumstellar matter to be ejected in the decades before the pair-instability explosion.\n

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449919/pdf
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary and secondary source of energy in the superluminous supernova 2018ibb

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Primary and secondary source of energy in the superluminous supernova 2018ibb

article en

Abstract

\nWe examined a possible pair-instability origin for the superluminous supernova 2018ibb. As the base model, we used a non-rotating stellar model with an initial mass of 250 M⊙ at about 1/15 solar metallicity. We considered three versions of the model as input for radiative transfer simulations done with the S<sc>TELLA</sc> and A<sc>RTIS</sc> codes: with 25 M⊙ of 56Ni, with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni, and a chemically mixed case with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni. We present light curves and spectra in comparison to the observed data of SN 2018ibb, and conclude that the pair-instability supernova model with 34 M⊙ of 56Ni explains the broadband light curves reasonably well between −100 and 250 days around the peak. Our synthetic spectra have many similarities with the observed spectra. The luminosity excess in the light curves and the blue-flux excess in the spectra can be explained by an additional energy source, which may be an interaction of the supernova ejecta with circumstellar matter. We discuss possible mechanisms that could have caused the circumstellar matter to be ejected in the decades before the pair-instability explosion.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Russian Science Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.