Potential EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation of the MethanolSynthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

Two methanol production process options based on gas-to-methanol (GTM) technology according to the CO<sub>2</sub> feed location (option 1: CO<sub>2</sub> is fed to the methanol synthesis unit via a reformer; option 2: CO<sub>2</sub> is directly fed to the methanol synthesis unit) are proposed. In this study, we simulated these two methanol synthesis process options at a steam/natural gas (S/NG) ratio of 1.5 and evaluated the environmental impact of the two options by comparing the potential environment impact (PEI) according to the recycle ratio of unreacted syngas. We simulated the process using Aspen Plus and quantitated the PEI rates using the Waste Reduction (WAR) algorithm (version 1.0). The results show that in both cases PEI rates decrease with increasing recycle ratio of the unreacted syngas and thus become environmentally friendly. Also, it was demonstrated that option 1 is more environmentally friendly than option 2, and when the recycle ratio increases from 0 to 0.9, the total rate of PEI output decreases from 176.3 to 93.4 PEI/h by 53.0% and the PEI generation rate decreases from 149.9 to 67.0 PEI/h by 44.7%.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c10680.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation of the MethanolSynthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Potential EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation of the MethanolSynthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology

article en

Abstract

Two methanol production process options based on gas-to-methanol (GTM) technology according to the CO<sub>2</sub> feed location (option 1: CO<sub>2</sub> is fed to the methanol synthesis unit via a reformer; option 2: CO<sub>2</sub> is directly fed to the methanol synthesis unit) are proposed. In this study, we simulated these two methanol synthesis process options at a steam/natural gas (S/NG) ratio of 1.5 and evaluated the environmental impact of the two options by comparing the potential environment impact (PEI) according to the recycle ratio of unreacted syngas. We simulated the process using Aspen Plus and quantitated the PEI rates using the Waste Reduction (WAR) algorithm (version 1.0). The results show that in both cases PEI rates decrease with increasing recycle ratio of the unreacted syngas and thus become environmentally friendly. Also, it was demonstrated that option 1 is more environmentally friendly than option 2, and when the recycle ratio increases from 0 to 0.9, the total rate of PEI output decreases from 176.3 to 93.4 PEI/h by 53.0% and the PEI generation rate decreases from 149.9 to 67.0 PEI/h by 44.7%.

Figshare
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Potential EnvironmentalImpact Evaluation of the MethanolSynthesis Process by Gas-to-Methanol Technology · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS