Hydrogen, Oxygen,\nand Lead Adsorbates on Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100): Accurate\nPotential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational\nCost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

Intermetallic compounds are promising materials in numerous\nfields,\nespecially those involving surface interactions, such as catalysis.\nA key factor to investigate their surface properties lies in adsorption\nenergy maps, typically built using first-principles approaches. However,\nexploring the adsorption energy landscapes of intermetallic compounds\ncan be cumbersome, usually requiring huge computational resources.\nIn this work, we propose an efficient method to predict adsorption\nenergies, based on a Machine Learning (ML) scheme fed by a few Density\nFunctional Theory (DFT) estimates performed on <i>n</i> sites\nselected through the Farthest Point Sampling (FPS) process. We detail\nits application on the Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100) quasicrystalline\napproximant surface for several atomic adsorbates (H, O, and Pb).\nOn this specific example, our approach is shown to outperform both\nsimple interpolation strategies and the recent ML force field MACE\n[arXiv.2206.07697], especially when the number <i>n</i> is small, i.e.,\nbelow 36 sites. The ground-truth DFT adsorption energies are much\nmore correlated with the predicted FPS-ML estimates (Pearson R-factor\nof 0.71, 0.73, and 0.90 for H, O and Pb, respectively, when <i>n</i> = 36) than with interpolation-based or MACE-ML ones (Pearson\nR-factors of 0.43, 0.39, and 0.56 for H, O, and Pb, in the former\ncase and 0.22, 0.35, and 0.63 in the latter case). The unbiased root-mean-square\nerror (ubRMSE) is lower for FPS-ML than for interpolation-based and\nMACE-ML predictions (0.15, 0.17, and 0.17 eV, respectively, for hydrogen\nand 0.17, 0.25, and 0.22 eV for lead), except for oxygen (0.55, 0.47,\nand 0.46 eV) due to large surface relaxations in this case. We believe\nthat these findings and the corresponding methodology can be extended\nto a wide range of systems, which will motivate the discovery of novel\nfunctional materials.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00367.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen, Oxygen,\nand Lead Adsorbates on Al13Co4(100): Accurate\nPotential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational\nCost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Hydrogen, Oxygen,\nand Lead Adsorbates on Al13Co4(100): Accurate\nPotential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational\nCost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

article en

Abstract

Intermetallic compounds are promising materials in numerous\nfields,\nespecially those involving surface interactions, such as catalysis.\nA key factor to investigate their surface properties lies in adsorption\nenergy maps, typically built using first-principles approaches. However,\nexploring the adsorption energy landscapes of intermetallic compounds\ncan be cumbersome, usually requiring huge computational resources.\nIn this work, we propose an efficient method to predict adsorption\nenergies, based on a Machine Learning (ML) scheme fed by a few Density\nFunctional Theory (DFT) estimates performed on <i>n</i> sites\nselected through the Farthest Point Sampling (FPS) process. We detail\nits application on the Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100) quasicrystalline\napproximant surface for several atomic adsorbates (H, O, and Pb).\nOn this specific example, our approach is shown to outperform both\nsimple interpolation strategies and the recent ML force field MACE\n[arXiv.2206.07697], especially when the number <i>n</i> is small, i.e.,\nbelow 36 sites. The ground-truth DFT adsorption energies are much\nmore correlated with the predicted FPS-ML estimates (Pearson R-factor\nof 0.71, 0.73, and 0.90 for H, O and Pb, respectively, when <i>n</i> = 36) than with interpolation-based or MACE-ML ones (Pearson\nR-factors of 0.43, 0.39, and 0.56 for H, O, and Pb, in the former\ncase and 0.22, 0.35, and 0.63 in the latter case). The unbiased root-mean-square\nerror (ubRMSE) is lower for FPS-ML than for interpolation-based and\nMACE-ML predictions (0.15, 0.17, and 0.17 eV, respectively, for hydrogen\nand 0.17, 0.25, and 0.22 eV for lead), except for oxygen (0.55, 0.47,\nand 0.46 eV) due to large surface relaxations in this case. We believe\nthat these findings and the corresponding methodology can be extended\nto a wide range of systems, which will motivate the discovery of novel\nfunctional materials.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.