Properties Evaluationof Different Graphite Brandsthrough the Development of Electrochemical Sensors for Phenolic CompoundsDetection

Graphite is one of the most utilized materials for producing conductive inks for screen-printed electrodes (SPEs). Because of their wide range of applications, several brands are available in the market. Consequently, it is possible to find particles with different properties. In this context, these differences can generate variations in the device performance. Based on this, the present work compares paper analytical devices (PADs), which were prepared with three different graphite brands and photographic paper, to evaluate how these possible distinctions can affect the devices’ performance. CA detection was carried out with square wave voltammetry, where the devices produced with Fisher Chemical and Sigma-Aldrich graphite stood out for their high stability and current magnitude. Under the optimized parameters, analytical curves were constructed for each PAD, resulting in 5.0 × 10<sup>–6</sup> to 1.0 × 10<sup>–4</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup> and 5.0 × 10<sup>–7</sup> to 1.0 × 10<sup>–4</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup> for that manufactured with Fisher Chemical and Sigma-Aldrich graphite, respectively. In addition, the limits of detection were 1.39 μmol L<sup>–1</sup> for the one produced with Fisher Chemical graphite and 0.288 μmol L<sup>–1</sup> for the one produced with Sigma-Aldrich graphite.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c10281.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Properties Evaluationof Different Graphite Brandsthrough the Development of Electrochemical Sensors for Phenolic CompoundsDetection

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Properties Evaluationof Different Graphite Brandsthrough the Development of Electrochemical Sensors for Phenolic CompoundsDetection

article en

Abstract

Graphite is one of the most utilized materials for producing conductive inks for screen-printed electrodes (SPEs). Because of their wide range of applications, several brands are available in the market. Consequently, it is possible to find particles with different properties. In this context, these differences can generate variations in the device performance. Based on this, the present work compares paper analytical devices (PADs), which were prepared with three different graphite brands and photographic paper, to evaluate how these possible distinctions can affect the devices’ performance. CA detection was carried out with square wave voltammetry, where the devices produced with Fisher Chemical and Sigma-Aldrich graphite stood out for their high stability and current magnitude. Under the optimized parameters, analytical curves were constructed for each PAD, resulting in 5.0 × 10<sup>–6</sup> to 1.0 × 10<sup>–4</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup> and 5.0 × 10<sup>–7</sup> to 1.0 × 10<sup>–4</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup> for that manufactured with Fisher Chemical and Sigma-Aldrich graphite, respectively. In addition, the limits of detection were 1.39 μmol L<sup>–1</sup> for the one produced with Fisher Chemical graphite and 0.288 μmol L<sup>–1</sup> for the one produced with Sigma-Aldrich graphite.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Properties Evaluationof Different Graphite Brandsthrough the Development of Electrochemical Sensors for Phenolic CompoundsDetection · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS