RankMHC: Learning\nto Rank Class‑I Peptide-MHC\nStructural Models

The binding of peptides to class-I Major Histocompability\nComplex\n(MHC) receptors and their subsequent recognition downstream by T-cell\nreceptors are crucial processes for most multicellular organisms to\nbe able to fight various diseases. Thus, the identification of peptide\nantigens that can elicit an immune response is of immense importance\nfor developing successful therapies for bacterial and viral infections,\neven cancer. Recently, studies have demonstrated the importance of\npeptide-MHC (pMHC) structural analysis, with pMHC structural modeling\nmethods gradually becoming more popular in peptide antigen identification\nworkflows. Most of the pMHC structural modeling tools provide an ensemble\nof candidate peptide poses in the MHC-I cleft, each associated with\na score stemming from a scoring function, with the top scoring pose\nassumed to be the most representative of the ensemble. However, identifying\nthe binding mode, that is, the peptide pose from the ensemble that\nis closer to an unavailable native structure, is not trivial. Oftentimes,\nthe peptide poses characterized as best by a protein–ligand\nscoring function are not the ones that are the most representative\nof the actual structure. In this work, we frame the peptide binding\npose identification problem as a Learning-to-Rank (LTR) problem. We\npresent RankMHC, an LTR-based pMHC binding mode identification predictor,\nwhich is specifically trained to predict the most accurate ranking\nof an ensemble of pMHC conformations. RankMHC outperforms classical\npeptide-ligand scoring functions, as well as previous Machine Learning\n(ML)-based binding pose predictors. We further demonstrate that RankMHC\ncan be used with many pMHC structural modeling tools that use different\nstructural modeling protocols.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01278.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RankMHC: Learning\nto Rank Class‑I Peptide-MHC\nStructural Models

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

RankMHC: Learning\nto Rank Class‑I Peptide-MHC\nStructural Models

article en

Abstract

The binding of peptides to class-I Major Histocompability\nComplex\n(MHC) receptors and their subsequent recognition downstream by T-cell\nreceptors are crucial processes for most multicellular organisms to\nbe able to fight various diseases. Thus, the identification of peptide\nantigens that can elicit an immune response is of immense importance\nfor developing successful therapies for bacterial and viral infections,\neven cancer. Recently, studies have demonstrated the importance of\npeptide-MHC (pMHC) structural analysis, with pMHC structural modeling\nmethods gradually becoming more popular in peptide antigen identification\nworkflows. Most of the pMHC structural modeling tools provide an ensemble\nof candidate peptide poses in the MHC-I cleft, each associated with\na score stemming from a scoring function, with the top scoring pose\nassumed to be the most representative of the ensemble. However, identifying\nthe binding mode, that is, the peptide pose from the ensemble that\nis closer to an unavailable native structure, is not trivial. Oftentimes,\nthe peptide poses characterized as best by a protein–ligand\nscoring function are not the ones that are the most representative\nof the actual structure. In this work, we frame the peptide binding\npose identification problem as a Learning-to-Rank (LTR) problem. We\npresent RankMHC, an LTR-based pMHC binding mode identification predictor,\nwhich is specifically trained to predict the most accurate ranking\nof an ensemble of pMHC conformations. RankMHC outperforms classical\npeptide-ligand scoring functions, as well as previous Machine Learning\n(ML)-based binding pose predictors. We further demonstrate that RankMHC\ncan be used with many pMHC structural modeling tools that use different\nstructural modeling protocols.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RankMHC: Learning\nto Rank Class‑I Peptide-MHC\nStructural Models · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS