Assessment of occupational radiation exposure among various medical professions in interventional cardiology: A five-year study (2018–2022)

Occupational radiation exposure in medical settings is a growing concern, especially in interventional cardiology. This study aims to assess the occupational radiation exposure among medical personnel in interventional cardiology from 2018 to 2022. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the annual mean effective doses (AMED) and the average over a five-year period (MED-5y) among various medical professionals, including anesthesiologists, cardiologists, nurses, radiologists, and radiologic technologists. The effective doses were estimated using thermoluminescent dosimeters and analyzed to compute the AMED and MED-5y. Statistical significance was determined using T-tests and ANOVA, with subsequent Tukey Post-Hoc Tests for specific group comparisons. The AMED varied significantly among professions, with cardiologists experiencing the highest exposure (3.469 ± 7.81 mSv in 2022). An overall increase in AMED doses was observed from 2018 to 2022. The results of the T-Test showed a significant difference in the radiation exposure across the years under study (p < .001). The MED-5y were anesthesiologists (0.62 ± 0.30), cardiologists (3.23 ± 7.37), nurses (1.17 ± 0.56), radiologic technologists (1.13 ± 0.38), and radiologists (0.86 ± 0.26). The study also found significant differences in MED-5y across professions (F = 14.8, p < .001). Gender-based analysis indicated significant differences in MED-5y, particularly among nurses and radiologists. The results of this study revealed that the annual effective dose received by anesthesiologists, cardiologists, nurses, radiologists, and radiologic technologists was below the recommended occupational dose limits, as stipulated by both national and international standards.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025003/pdf
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of occupational radiation exposure among various medical professions in interventional cardiology: A five-year study (2018–2022)

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Assessment of occupational radiation exposure among various medical professions in interventional cardiology: A five-year study (2018–2022)

article en

Abstract

Occupational radiation exposure in medical settings is a growing concern, especially in interventional cardiology. This study aims to assess the occupational radiation exposure among medical personnel in interventional cardiology from 2018 to 2022. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the annual mean effective doses (AMED) and the average over a five-year period (MED-5y) among various medical professionals, including anesthesiologists, cardiologists, nurses, radiologists, and radiologic technologists. The effective doses were estimated using thermoluminescent dosimeters and analyzed to compute the AMED and MED-5y. Statistical significance was determined using T-tests and ANOVA, with subsequent Tukey Post-Hoc Tests for specific group comparisons. The AMED varied significantly among professions, with cardiologists experiencing the highest exposure (3.469 ± 7.81 mSv in 2022). An overall increase in AMED doses was observed from 2018 to 2022. The results of the T-Test showed a significant difference in the radiation exposure across the years under study (p < .001). The MED-5y were anesthesiologists (0.62 ± 0.30), cardiologists (3.23 ± 7.37), nurses (1.17 ± 0.56), radiologic technologists (1.13 ± 0.38), and radiologists (0.86 ± 0.26). The study also found significant differences in MED-5y across professions (F = 14.8, p < .001). Gender-based analysis indicated significant differences in MED-5y, particularly among nurses and radiologists. The results of this study revealed that the annual effective dose received by anesthesiologists, cardiologists, nurses, radiologists, and radiologic technologists was below the recommended occupational dose limits, as stipulated by both national and international standards.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.