Relationship Between the End-Cap Structure of Polyurethanes\nand Their Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition Activity: Effective Hydrate Prevention\nat Low Concentrations

To\naddress the challenges associated with gas hydrate formation\nin deepwater environments, two novel waterborne polyurethanes were\ndeveloped using etidronic acid (EA-WPU) and citric acid (CA-WPU) as\nkinetic hydrate inhibitors. EA-WPU exhibited superior inhibition,\ncompletely preventing sII hydrate formation at a concentration of\n0.5 wt %. CA-WPU also showed strong performance, with subcooling temperature\n(Δ<i>T</i>) values of 13.16 and 11.62 °C at concentrations\nof 0.5 and 0.25 wt %, respectively. These polymers have demonstrated\nhigh efficiency in inhibiting sII gas hydrate formation, even at a\nlow concentration of (0.05 wt %). The inhibition performance against\nsI hydrates varied, with Luvicap EG and CA-WPU demonstrating the strongest\ninhibitory effects. At 0.5 wt %, CA-WPU exhibited a Δ<i>T</i> value of 6.05 °C, comparable to that of Luvicap EG.\nThis study suggests that the specific functional groups present in\nthe end-cap structure of WPUs directly influence their ability to\ninhibit sI and sII hydrates. Carboxylic acid and phosphonate groups\nappear to be more effective for sI and sII hydrates, respectively.\nMoreover, field-specific assessments demonstrated that EA-WPU at 0.25\nwt % achieved a Δ<i>T</i> of 15.5 °C, surpassing\nthe required Δ<i>T</i> of 12 °C to prevent hydrate\nformation at 280 bar and 15 °C. This allowed for a 90-fold reduction\nin inhibitor consumption compared to 23 wt % methanol solution. Additionally,\nthe inhibitor solutions remained transparent and exhibited no clouding\nup to 70 °C at concentrations of 2 and 1 wt %, respectively.\nAlthough clouding occurred at higher concentrations and temperatures,\nboth solutions remained stable without deposition even at a concentration\nof 8 wt % and a temperature of 70 °C. These results highlight\nthe excellent thermal stability of EA-WPU and CA-WPU, making them\nsuitable for high-temperature injection up to 2 wt %. Good inhibition\nperformance at low concentrations and high thermal stability of WPUs\nmake them promising candidates for widespread application in gas hydrate\nmanagement, offering significant operational cost savings and reduced\nenvironmental impact.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02628.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship Between the End-Cap Structure of Polyurethanes\nand Their Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition Activity: Effective Hydrate Prevention\nat Low Concentrations

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Relationship Between the End-Cap Structure of Polyurethanes\nand Their Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition Activity: Effective Hydrate Prevention\nat Low Concentrations

article en

Abstract

To\naddress the challenges associated with gas hydrate formation\nin deepwater environments, two novel waterborne polyurethanes were\ndeveloped using etidronic acid (EA-WPU) and citric acid (CA-WPU) as\nkinetic hydrate inhibitors. EA-WPU exhibited superior inhibition,\ncompletely preventing sII hydrate formation at a concentration of\n0.5 wt %. CA-WPU also showed strong performance, with subcooling temperature\n(Δ<i>T</i>) values of 13.16 and 11.62 °C at concentrations\nof 0.5 and 0.25 wt %, respectively. These polymers have demonstrated\nhigh efficiency in inhibiting sII gas hydrate formation, even at a\nlow concentration of (0.05 wt %). The inhibition performance against\nsI hydrates varied, with Luvicap EG and CA-WPU demonstrating the strongest\ninhibitory effects. At 0.5 wt %, CA-WPU exhibited a Δ<i>T</i> value of 6.05 °C, comparable to that of Luvicap EG.\nThis study suggests that the specific functional groups present in\nthe end-cap structure of WPUs directly influence their ability to\ninhibit sI and sII hydrates. Carboxylic acid and phosphonate groups\nappear to be more effective for sI and sII hydrates, respectively.\nMoreover, field-specific assessments demonstrated that EA-WPU at 0.25\nwt % achieved a Δ<i>T</i> of 15.5 °C, surpassing\nthe required Δ<i>T</i> of 12 °C to prevent hydrate\nformation at 280 bar and 15 °C. This allowed for a 90-fold reduction\nin inhibitor consumption compared to 23 wt % methanol solution. Additionally,\nthe inhibitor solutions remained transparent and exhibited no clouding\nup to 70 °C at concentrations of 2 and 1 wt %, respectively.\nAlthough clouding occurred at higher concentrations and temperatures,\nboth solutions remained stable without deposition even at a concentration\nof 8 wt % and a temperature of 70 °C. These results highlight\nthe excellent thermal stability of EA-WPU and CA-WPU, making them\nsuitable for high-temperature injection up to 2 wt %. Good inhibition\nperformance at low concentrations and high thermal stability of WPUs\nmake them promising candidates for widespread application in gas hydrate\nmanagement, offering significant operational cost savings and reduced\nenvironmental impact.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationship Between the End-Cap Structure of Polyurethanes\nand Their Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition Activity: Effective Hydrate Prevention\nat Low Concentrations · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS