Understanding and\nControlling Structural Defects and\nDisordering in LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Cathodes\nfor Direct Recycling

Despite significant progress in recycling spent lithium-ion\nbatteries\n(LIBs), nondestructive, direct recycling methods still face untenable\ndiscrepancies in multiple cathode chemistries, which primarily originate\nfrom a variety of structure stabilities during the recycling process.\nThrough systematic investigation of the microstructure evolution during\nthe relithiation treatment, we observed the inevitably induced defects\nand Li/Mn disordering in the LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> cathode, contributing to the sluggish Li<sup>+</sup> transport\nand irreversible capacity loss. Employing a defect engineering approach\nto achieve twin boundaries and preferred grain orientation, we show\nthe regenerated cathodes demonstrate a substantial enhancement of\nLi<sup>+</sup> diffusion and cycling stability, retaining 97.4% capacity\nafter 100 cycles and 87.96% after 200 cycles at C/3. This work not\nonly elaborates on a systematic investigation of defect inducement\nand structural restoration mechanism but also provides an effective\napproach to directly recycle high-voltage spinel-type cathodes, contributing\nto the sustainability of next-generation LIBs.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c10164.s001
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and\nControlling Structural Defects and\nDisordering in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Cathodes\nfor Direct Recycling

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Understanding and\nControlling Structural Defects and\nDisordering in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Cathodes\nfor Direct Recycling

article en

Abstract

Despite significant progress in recycling spent lithium-ion\nbatteries\n(LIBs), nondestructive, direct recycling methods still face untenable\ndiscrepancies in multiple cathode chemistries, which primarily originate\nfrom a variety of structure stabilities during the recycling process.\nThrough systematic investigation of the microstructure evolution during\nthe relithiation treatment, we observed the inevitably induced defects\nand Li/Mn disordering in the LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> cathode, contributing to the sluggish Li<sup>+</sup> transport\nand irreversible capacity loss. Employing a defect engineering approach\nto achieve twin boundaries and preferred grain orientation, we show\nthe regenerated cathodes demonstrate a substantial enhancement of\nLi<sup>+</sup> diffusion and cycling stability, retaining 97.4% capacity\nafter 100 cycles and 87.96% after 200 cycles at C/3. This work not\nonly elaborates on a systematic investigation of defect inducement\nand structural restoration mechanism but also provides an effective\napproach to directly recycle high-voltage spinel-type cathodes, contributing\nto the sustainability of next-generation LIBs.

Figshare
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding and\nControlling Structural Defects and\nDisordering in LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Cathodes\nfor Direct Recycling · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS