One-shot vs. competitions phonotactics in modeling constraing cumulativity

Previous literature often models probabilistic phonotactic patterns with all candidate forms in a single competition, while other phonotactic models structure candidates in separate competitions, each competing against a null candidate that violates an opposing constraint only once. This paper finds that the structure of the candidate competition in probabilistic phonological models such as MaxEnt (Hayes & Wilson, 2008) affect the way constraints interact in the grammar. Specifically, "one-shot" grammar structures wherein all candidates are in the same competition predict that additional violations may only take an increasingly smaller hit on probability relative to preceding violations, while "multiple competitions" grammar structures can predict that later violations may take a greater hit on probability relative to previous violations. Ultimately, these results shed light on the grammar structures necessary for capturing cumulative constraint interactions and on their consequences for phonotactics and phonotactic learning in general.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/amphonology.3013
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-shot vs. competitions phonotactics in modeling constraing cumulativity

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

One-shot vs. competitions phonotactics in modeling constraing cumulativity

article en

Abstract

Previous literature often models probabilistic phonotactic patterns with all candidate forms in a single competition, while other phonotactic models structure candidates in separate competitions, each competing against a null candidate that violates an opposing constraint only once. This paper finds that the structure of the candidate competition in probabilistic phonological models such as MaxEnt (Hayes & Wilson, 2008) affect the way constraints interact in the grammar. Specifically, "one-shot" grammar structures wherein all candidates are in the same competition predict that additional violations may only take an increasingly smaller hit on probability relative to preceding violations, while "multiple competitions" grammar structures can predict that later violations may take a greater hit on probability relative to previous violations. Ultimately, these results shed light on the grammar structures necessary for capturing cumulative constraint interactions and on their consequences for phonotactics and phonotactic learning in general.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One-shot vs. competitions phonotactics in modeling constraing cumulativity · University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS