Comparative Analysis of Residential Tree Norms in Chicopee, Massachusetts and Uppsala, Sweden

Municipal leaders worldwide are pursuing urban tree planting initiatives (TPIs) to improve the liveability and sustainability of cities. More than 60 municipalities around the world have committed to planting over 11 million trees as part of the Trees in Cities Challenge and in the United States, $1.5 billion in federal funding has been allocated toward urban tree planting and management as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. These greening campaigns are often predicated on ambitious goals to increase urban tree cover, but this will be difficult to achieve without considerable planting on residential land, which constitutes a significant proportion of landcover in urban areas. This is one of many reasons that active engagement with residents is important for sustainable TPIs. As TPIs becomes an increasingly global practice, an additional consideration is that different places have different urban form and planting potential. By extension, the size, shape, and type of residential land may differ between cities internationally, and within neighbourhoods in the same city, which can result in inequitable distribution of urban greenspace. To address some of the challenges noted above, we will present initial findings from the first phase of a multi-year study to assess the planting potential of trees on residential land in different places. One of our study locations is Chicopee, Massachusetts in the United States; the other is Uppsala, Sweden. Across these two study sites, we have inventoried trees in neighbourhoods that were built in different historical periods. This inventory covered both single- and multi-family residential areas. The inventory and associated analysis includes a classification of trees by functional categories (i.e. large deciduous shade tree; fruiting/flowering tree; conifer; hedge), tree height and width, and average number of trees per site. This quantitative analysis is supplemented by figure-ground drawings that illustrate the typical size and shape of residential parcels and surrounding neighbourhoods. Building upon this initial research focusing on environmental factors that inform TPI development and implementation, we hope to conduct future data collection and analysis including socio-demographic characteristics, GIS spatial analysis, and surveys of resident preferences and perception.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/fabos.2746
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Residential Tree Norms in Chicopee, Massachusetts and Uppsala, Sweden

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Comparative Analysis of Residential Tree Norms in Chicopee, Massachusetts and Uppsala, Sweden

article en

Abstract

Municipal leaders worldwide are pursuing urban tree planting initiatives (TPIs) to improve the liveability and sustainability of cities. More than 60 municipalities around the world have committed to planting over 11 million trees as part of the Trees in Cities Challenge and in the United States, $1.5 billion in federal funding has been allocated toward urban tree planting and management as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. These greening campaigns are often predicated on ambitious goals to increase urban tree cover, but this will be difficult to achieve without considerable planting on residential land, which constitutes a significant proportion of landcover in urban areas. This is one of many reasons that active engagement with residents is important for sustainable TPIs. As TPIs becomes an increasingly global practice, an additional consideration is that different places have different urban form and planting potential. By extension, the size, shape, and type of residential land may differ between cities internationally, and within neighbourhoods in the same city, which can result in inequitable distribution of urban greenspace. To address some of the challenges noted above, we will present initial findings from the first phase of a multi-year study to assess the planting potential of trees on residential land in different places. One of our study locations is Chicopee, Massachusetts in the United States; the other is Uppsala, Sweden. Across these two study sites, we have inventoried trees in neighbourhoods that were built in different historical periods. This inventory covered both single- and multi-family residential areas. The inventory and associated analysis includes a classification of trees by functional categories (i.e. large deciduous shade tree; fruiting/flowering tree; conifer; hedge), tree height and width, and average number of trees per site. This quantitative analysis is supplemented by figure-ground drawings that illustrate the typical size and shape of residential parcels and surrounding neighbourhoods. Building upon this initial research focusing on environmental factors that inform TPI development and implementation, we hope to conduct future data collection and analysis including socio-demographic characteristics, GIS spatial analysis, and surveys of resident preferences and perception.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.