Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weakness

<p dir="ltr">This book is considered the first significant work that provides a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the process of reviewing works in scientific journals. The author, Dr. Ann C. Weller (Associate Professor and Associate Director at the University of Illinois at Chicago's Library of Health Sciences), presents a systematic, thorough, and organized review of published studies related to the peer review of works in the following broad areas: general studies on the rejection rates of submissions, studies conducted on editors, studies on authors, and studies on reviewers.</p><p dir="ltr">The book concludes with an examination of new models of the peer review process aimed at enhancing scientific communication as this process transitions from a print environment to an electronic one. "The Peer Review Process in Scientific Journals" is a unique work that will be beneficial for editors, reviewers, publishers, professionals in specialized academic societies, authors, researchers, librarians, and all others involved in the production, acquisition, and dissemination of texts and scientific outputs.</p>

Publication Details

Journal
INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27021250.v1
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weakness

INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weakness

article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">This book is considered the first significant work that provides a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the process of reviewing works in scientific journals. The author, Dr. Ann C. Weller (Associate Professor and Associate Director at the University of Illinois at Chicago's Library of Health Sciences), presents a systematic, thorough, and organized review of published studies related to the peer review of works in the following broad areas: general studies on the rejection rates of submissions, studies conducted on editors, studies on authors, and studies on reviewers.</p><p dir="ltr">The book concludes with an examination of new models of the peer review process aimed at enhancing scientific communication as this process transitions from a print environment to an electronic one. "The Peer Review Process in Scientific Journals" is a unique work that will be beneficial for editors, reviewers, publishers, professionals in specialized academic societies, authors, researchers, librarians, and all others involved in the production, acquisition, and dissemination of texts and scientific outputs.</p>

INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.