Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis Through Clustering: A Study of KMeans, Agglomerative, and Gaussian Mixture Models

In the evolving landscape of medical data analysis, clustering techniques play a pivotal role, particularly in deciphering intricate patterns within datasets, such as those linked to cancer diagnostics. With the continuous expansion and increasing complexity of healthcare data, there is a growing demand for effective clustering algorithms capable of extracting significant insights. Current trends underscore the necessity of carefully selecting the most appropriate clustering method to improve both the accuracy and interpretability of analytical results. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive comparison of three prominent clustering algorithms - KMeans, Agglomerative Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) - applied to a breast cancer dataset comprising features from Fine Needle Aspirates (FNA) of breast masses. Following a thorough preprocessing and scaling of the features, we assess the performance of these clustering techniques using the Silhouette Score, Calinski-Harabasz Score, and Davies-Bouldin Score. The findings reveal that KMeans provides superior cluster separation and clarity relative to the other algorithms. This research emphasizes the critical role of algorithm selection based on specific dataset attributes and evaluation metrics, aiming to enhance the accuracy of clustering outcomes in breast cancer classification.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27000310
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis Through Clustering: A Study of KMeans, Agglomerative, and Gaussian Mixture Models

Figshare
AI in cancer detection
article

Enhancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis Through Clustering: A Study of KMeans, Agglomerative, and Gaussian Mixture Models

article en

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of medical data analysis, clustering techniques play a pivotal role, particularly in deciphering intricate patterns within datasets, such as those linked to cancer diagnostics. With the continuous expansion and increasing complexity of healthcare data, there is a growing demand for effective clustering algorithms capable of extracting significant insights. Current trends underscore the necessity of carefully selecting the most appropriate clustering method to improve both the accuracy and interpretability of analytical results. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive comparison of three prominent clustering algorithms - KMeans, Agglomerative Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) - applied to a breast cancer dataset comprising features from Fine Needle Aspirates (FNA) of breast masses. Following a thorough preprocessing and scaling of the features, we assess the performance of these clustering techniques using the Silhouette Score, Calinski-Harabasz Score, and Davies-Bouldin Score. The findings reveal that KMeans provides superior cluster separation and clarity relative to the other algorithms. This research emphasizes the critical role of algorithm selection based on specific dataset attributes and evaluation metrics, aiming to enhance the accuracy of clustering outcomes in breast cancer classification.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.