Readability for Second Language English Learners

Readability assessment models play a crucial role in a wide range of contexts where it is important to confirm that there is alignment between an individual’s reading level and the difficulty of a text material. Despite such importance and utility, readability formulas that are currently popular are lacking in at least three aspects. One, despite the majority of English speakers being non-native English speakers (NNES; Ethnologue, 2022), most formulas were developed using text difficulty ratings gathered from a monolithic group of native English speakers (NES). Second, the corpora used to derive these models are generally either small-scale or lacking in genre diversity, impacting the models’ generalizability. Third, most models utilize surface-level linguistic features only, which are not strongly backed by theories of reading comprehension. This study addresses these limitations by developing a large-scale corpus with difficulty ratings collected from four different groups of NES and non-native English speakers (NNES) and deriving more advanced readability assessment models based on the corpus using linguistic features and large language models (LLMs). Through the derivation and analyses of these models as well as the analyses of readability ratings from the four different language groups, this study provides insights with regard to the differences in text difficulty perception across language groups, as well as producing performant, interpretable readability assessment models for each language group. This study will have important implications on the theories of second language (L2) reading comprehension, and on the practical use of readability assessment models across all relevant domains.

Publication Details

Journal
Georgia State University Repository
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/ewrc-7m44
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Readability for Second Language English Learners

Georgia State University Repository
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Readability for Second Language English Learners

article en

Abstract

Readability assessment models play a crucial role in a wide range of contexts where it is important to confirm that there is alignment between an individual’s reading level and the difficulty of a text material. Despite such importance and utility, readability formulas that are currently popular are lacking in at least three aspects. One, despite the majority of English speakers being non-native English speakers (NNES; Ethnologue, 2022), most formulas were developed using text difficulty ratings gathered from a monolithic group of native English speakers (NES). Second, the corpora used to derive these models are generally either small-scale or lacking in genre diversity, impacting the models’ generalizability. Third, most models utilize surface-level linguistic features only, which are not strongly backed by theories of reading comprehension. This study addresses these limitations by developing a large-scale corpus with difficulty ratings collected from four different groups of NES and non-native English speakers (NNES) and deriving more advanced readability assessment models based on the corpus using linguistic features and large language models (LLMs). Through the derivation and analyses of these models as well as the analyses of readability ratings from the four different language groups, this study provides insights with regard to the differences in text difficulty perception across language groups, as well as producing performant, interpretable readability assessment models for each language group. This study will have important implications on the theories of second language (L2) reading comprehension, and on the practical use of readability assessment models across all relevant domains.

Georgia State University Repository
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.