Assessment of Field Displacement for Implications of Support Design in Tunneling

In tunnel engineering, accurately predicting displacement in jointed rock masses is crucial for stability and safety. Analytical and numerical methods are commonly used to evaluate tunnel wall displacement and the effectiveness of support systems. Duncan-Fama and Carranza-Torres solutions have been employed to predict tunnel wall displacement using the ground reaction curve, both before and after support installation. A significant difference in tunnel wall displacement were observed between the two methods when the support was applied. The numerical method yielded lower displacement values compared to the analytical method. The pullout test shows the rock bolts' effective stress distribution and stability, evident through their linear stress-displacement relationship and significant yield strength expansion. The integration of both analytical and numerical methods allows for a comprehensive understanding of displacement behavior, enhancing the design and implementation of effective support systems in tunnel engineering.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OICC Press Journals
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ijes.2025.16863
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Field Displacement for Implications of Support Design in Tunneling

OICC Press Journals
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Assessment of Field Displacement for Implications of Support Design in Tunneling

article en

Abstract

In tunnel engineering, accurately predicting displacement in jointed rock masses is crucial for stability and safety. Analytical and numerical methods are commonly used to evaluate tunnel wall displacement and the effectiveness of support systems. Duncan-Fama and Carranza-Torres solutions have been employed to predict tunnel wall displacement using the ground reaction curve, both before and after support installation. A significant difference in tunnel wall displacement were observed between the two methods when the support was applied. The numerical method yielded lower displacement values compared to the analytical method. The pullout test shows the rock bolts' effective stress distribution and stability, evident through their linear stress-displacement relationship and significant yield strength expansion. The integration of both analytical and numerical methods allows for a comprehensive understanding of displacement behavior, enhancing the design and implementation of effective support systems in tunnel engineering.

OICC Press Journals
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Karakoram International University (PK), National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Field Displacement for Implications of Support Design in Tunneling · OICC Press Journals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS