Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students with Disabilities? A Scoping Review: Protocol, Flowchart, Screening report, Zotero Collection

Following feedback from a reviewer, a second analysis was conducted. The documents were updated to include information with the second analysis. This repository contains supplementary materials for a scoping review that was submitted to the Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. It includes the following: Protocol of the scoping review PRISMA Flowchart Zotero collection Report on the screened articles Please do not hesitate to get in contact with Oriane Pierrès ([email protected]) should the file not be accessible to you. While we tried to make the materials as accessible as possible to everyone regardless of their abilities, there were some constraints that could not be overcome and we know that accessibility issues can still remain. The scoping review raised the following research questions: Research Question 1: To what extent are ethical concerns considered in articles presenting AI applications assessing students (with disabilities) in higher education? This requires answering two sub-questions: What are the ethical concerns mentioned in articles presenting AI applications assessing students in higher education? To what extent are students with disabilities mentioned? Research Question 2: What are the potential discrimination risks in using AI that assesses students with disabilities in higher education? What are the input data of the AI EdTech? What type of decision is taken? Who is taking the decision? How were the AI applications evaluated?

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7798688
Primary Topic
Tree-ring climate responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students with Disabilities? A Scoping Review: Protocol, Flowchart, Screening report, Zotero Collection

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tree-ring climate responses
article

Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students with Disabilities? A Scoping Review: Protocol, Flowchart, Screening report, Zotero Collection

article en

Abstract

Following feedback from a reviewer, a second analysis was conducted. The documents were updated to include information with the second analysis. This repository contains supplementary materials for a scoping review that was submitted to the Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. It includes the following: Protocol of the scoping review PRISMA Flowchart Zotero collection Report on the screened articles Please do not hesitate to get in contact with Oriane Pierrès ([email protected]) should the file not be accessible to you. While we tried to make the materials as accessible as possible to everyone regardless of their abilities, there were some constraints that could not be overcome and we know that accessibility issues can still remain. The scoping review raised the following research questions: Research Question 1: To what extent are ethical concerns considered in articles presenting AI applications assessing students (with disabilities) in higher education? This requires answering two sub-questions: What are the ethical concerns mentioned in articles presenting AI applications assessing students in higher education? To what extent are students with disabilities mentioned? Research Question 2: What are the potential discrimination risks in using AI that assesses students with disabilities in higher education? What are the input data of the AI EdTech? What type of decision is taken? Who is taking the decision? How were the AI applications evaluated?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Zurich (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Tree-ring climate responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.