Principal Component Analysis As The Final Step In Feature Selection.

This article provides an in-depth examination of the role of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in the feature engineering pipeline of machine learning. While PCA is widely recognized as a powerful dimensionality reduction tool, it is often misapplied or prematurely executed during data preprocessing. This paper argues that PCA should be positioned as the final step in feature selection, after filtering irrelevant features, normalizing data, and encoding categorical variables. The study compares PCA with traditional feature selection techniques; filter, wrapper, and embedded methods; highlighting the conceptual and functional differences. Using the Iris dataset as a case study, it demonstrates the consequences of applying PCA too early and the benefits of leveraging it at the final stage for optimal model performance and clarity. This work is valuable for data scientists, analysts, and ML engineers who seek to streamline preprocessing workflows, reduce multicollinearity, and enhance generalization in predictive modeling; all while preserving interpretability as much as possible before applying PCA.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15446523
Primary Topic
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principal Component Analysis As The Final Step In Feature Selection.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
article

Principal Component Analysis As The Final Step In Feature Selection.

article en

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth examination of the role of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in the feature engineering pipeline of machine learning. While PCA is widely recognized as a powerful dimensionality reduction tool, it is often misapplied or prematurely executed during data preprocessing. This paper argues that PCA should be positioned as the final step in feature selection, after filtering irrelevant features, normalizing data, and encoding categorical variables. The study compares PCA with traditional feature selection techniques; filter, wrapper, and embedded methods; highlighting the conceptual and functional differences. Using the Iris dataset as a case study, it demonstrates the consequences of applying PCA too early and the benefits of leveraging it at the final stage for optimal model performance and clarity. This work is valuable for data scientists, analysts, and ML engineers who seek to streamline preprocessing workflows, reduce multicollinearity, and enhance generalization in predictive modeling; all while preserving interpretability as much as possible before applying PCA.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Boston University (US), American Statistical Association (US), Kumasi Technical University (GH), Koforidua Technical University (GH), Statistical Service (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.