Ethical Responsibility and Climate Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Global Climate Agreements

Abstract: Climate change poses not only an environmental crisis but also a profound ethical challenge, raising questions of fairness, justice, and global responsibility. As nations grapple with rising temperatures and climate-induced disasters, international agreements serve as key instruments for collective action. This study examines how ethical responsibility is embedded—or at times neglected—in three major climate agreements: the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement, and the Glasgow Climate Pact. Using a qualitative comparative analysis, the research evaluates how these treaties address issues such as historical accountability, equity, and intergenerational justice. Findings reveal a gradual shift from rigid obligations to voluntary, equity-framed commitments, often lacking enforceability. While ethical language has become more prominent, significant gaps remain in translating ethical principles into binding policy. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating clearer ethical standards into future climate governance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15812617
Primary Topic
MicroRNA in disease regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Responsibility and Climate Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Global Climate Agreements

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
MicroRNA in disease regulation
article

Ethical Responsibility and Climate Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Global Climate Agreements

article en

Abstract

Abstract: Climate change poses not only an environmental crisis but also a profound ethical challenge, raising questions of fairness, justice, and global responsibility. As nations grapple with rising temperatures and climate-induced disasters, international agreements serve as key instruments for collective action. This study examines how ethical responsibility is embedded—or at times neglected—in three major climate agreements: the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement, and the Glasgow Climate Pact. Using a qualitative comparative analysis, the research evaluates how these treaties address issues such as historical accountability, equity, and intergenerational justice. Findings reveal a gradual shift from rigid obligations to voluntary, equity-framed commitments, often lacking enforceability. While ethical language has become more prominent, significant gaps remain in translating ethical principles into binding policy. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating clearer ethical standards into future climate governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government of Himachal Pradesh (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
MicroRNA in disease regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.