Andricus Hartig 1840

Key to European sexual generation Andricus species inducing indistinguishable galls that at the end of development appear as a muddled agglomerate of deformed leaves on Quercus section Cerris oaks 1. Females............................................................................................ 2 - Males.............................................................................................. 5 2. Fore wing distal fringe of marginal setae extremely short (Fig. 57).............................................. 3 - Fore wing distal fringe of marginal setae long.............................................................. 4 3. Mesoscutellum posteriorly rounded or truncated but not pointed, moderately rugose sculpturing evenly distributed across the surface; prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium slender, 5.3–5.7 times as long as broad in ventral view A. crispator ♀ - Mesoscutellum ending in a point and not rounded posteriorly, strongly rugose especially near the margins and posteriorly (Fig. 49); prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium 3.5–4.5 times as long as broad in ventral view (Figs 61, 65)................................................................................... A. pseudomultiplicatus sp. nov. ♀ 4. Body color mostly dark brown to black; frons, vertex and occiput reticulate; striae on mesopleuron present and very marked; mesoscutellum as long as broad, uniformly strongly areolate-rugose with distinct mainly longitudinal sharp rugae and with emarginate posterior margin; scutellar foveae subtriangular and well-delimited posteriorly; mesoscutum deeply colliculate.............................................................................. A. conificus (= A. cydoniae) ♀ - Body color mostly reddish yellow; frons, vertex, and occiput uniformly coriaceous (Figs 28, 29); mesopleuron without or with only very indistinct striae (Figs 26, 30); mesoscutellum broader than long, reticulate rugose around its limits, more delicate in the central part of disk with unemarginated posterior margin; scutellar foveae subrectangular and not or very slightly delimited posteriorly, mesoscutum shallowly colliculate (Fig 29)........................... A. truncicolus (= A. multiplicatus) ♀ 5. Frons, vertex, and occiput uniformly coriaceous (Figs 34, 36); mesopleuron without or with only very indistinct striae............................................................................ A. truncicolus (= A. multiplicatus) ♂ - Frons, vertex and occiput reticulate; striae on mesopleuron present and very marked................................ 6 6. Body color mostly dark brown to black; mesoscutum deeply colliculate; notauli complete, deep and well-impressed along whole length, not significantly widened and not excessively converging posteriorly, internotauli distance at posterior margin of mesoscutum is 2 times the width of one notaulus at the same point....................... A. conificus (= A. cydoniae) ♂ - Body predominantly reddish-yellow to amber-colored; mesoscutum not colliculate, delicately to strongly reticulate; notauli complete, deep and well-impressed along whole length, very wide and converging at the posterior end, internotauli distance at posterior margin of mesoscutum is 1.5–1.6 times the width of one notaulus at the same point......................... 7 7. POL approximately 1.5 times the length of OOL; OOL around 1.9 times as long as diameter of lateral ocellus; distance between torulus and inner margin of eye nearly 1.5 times the distance between toruli; mesoscutum strongly reticulate across the entire surface, around 1.7 times as long as the mesoscutellum; internotauli width near posterior margin of mesoscutum approximately 1.7 times the width of one notaulus at the same point.............................................. A. crispator ♂ - POL approximately 1.7 times as long as OOL; OOL approximately 2.2 times as long as diameter of lateral ocellus and 1.1 times as long as LOL; distance between torulus and inner margin of eye nearly 3.0 times the distance between toruli (Figs 66, 68); mesoscutum shallowly reticulate between notali, more weakly reticulate in the remaining parts, around 1.5 times as long as the mesoscutellum; internotauli width near posterior margin of mesoscutum approximately 1.6 times the width of one notaulus at the same point (Fig 71)..................................................... A. pseudomultiplicatus sp. nov. ♂

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15232073
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Andricus Hartig 1840

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Andricus Hartig 1840

article en

Abstract

Key to European sexual generation Andricus species inducing indistinguishable galls that at the end of development appear as a muddled agglomerate of deformed leaves on Quercus section Cerris oaks 1. Females............................................................................................ 2 - Males.............................................................................................. 5 2. Fore wing distal fringe of marginal setae extremely short (Fig. 57).............................................. 3 - Fore wing distal fringe of marginal setae long.............................................................. 4 3. Mesoscutellum posteriorly rounded or truncated but not pointed, moderately rugose sculpturing evenly distributed across the surface; prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium slender, 5.3–5.7 times as long as broad in ventral view A. crispator ♀ - Mesoscutellum ending in a point and not rounded posteriorly, strongly rugose especially near the margins and posteriorly (Fig. 49); prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium 3.5–4.5 times as long as broad in ventral view (Figs 61, 65)................................................................................... A. pseudomultiplicatus sp. nov. ♀ 4. Body color mostly dark brown to black; frons, vertex and occiput reticulate; striae on mesopleuron present and very marked; mesoscutellum as long as broad, uniformly strongly areolate-rugose with distinct mainly longitudinal sharp rugae and with emarginate posterior margin; scutellar foveae subtriangular and well-delimited posteriorly; mesoscutum deeply colliculate.............................................................................. A. conificus (= A. cydoniae) ♀ - Body color mostly reddish yellow; frons, vertex, and occiput uniformly coriaceous (Figs 28, 29); mesopleuron without or with only very indistinct striae (Figs 26, 30); mesoscutellum broader than long, reticulate rugose around its limits, more delicate in the central part of disk with unemarginated posterior margin; scutellar foveae subrectangular and not or very slightly delimited posteriorly, mesoscutum shallowly colliculate (Fig 29)........................... A. truncicolus (= A. multiplicatus) ♀ 5. Frons, vertex, and occiput uniformly coriaceous (Figs 34, 36); mesopleuron without or with only very indistinct striae............................................................................ A. truncicolus (= A. multiplicatus) ♂ - Frons, vertex and occiput reticulate; striae on mesopleuron present and very marked................................ 6 6. Body color mostly dark brown to black; mesoscutum deeply colliculate; notauli complete, deep and well-impressed along whole length, not significantly widened and not excessively converging posteriorly, internotauli distance at posterior margin of mesoscutum is 2 times the width of one notaulus at the same point....................... A. conificus (= A. cydoniae) ♂ - Body predominantly reddish-yellow to amber-colored; mesoscutum not colliculate, delicately to strongly reticulate; notauli complete, deep and well-impressed along whole length, very wide and converging at the posterior end, internotauli distance at posterior margin of mesoscutum is 1.5–1.6 times the width of one notaulus at the same point......................... 7 7. POL approximately 1.5 times the length of OOL; OOL around 1.9 times as long as diameter of lateral ocellus; distance between torulus and inner margin of eye nearly 1.5 times the distance between toruli; mesoscutum strongly reticulate across the entire surface, around 1.7 times as long as the mesoscutellum; internotauli width near posterior margin of mesoscutum approximately 1.7 times the width of one notaulus at the same point.............................................. A. crispator ♂ - POL approximately 1.7 times as long as OOL; OOL approximately 2.2 times as long as diameter of lateral ocellus and 1.1 times as long as LOL; distance between torulus and inner margin of eye nearly 3.0 times the distance between toruli (Figs 66, 68); mesoscutum shallowly reticulate between notali, more weakly reticulate in the remaining parts, around 1.5 times as long as the mesoscutellum; internotauli width near posterior margin of mesoscutum approximately 1.6 times the width of one notaulus at the same point (Fig 71)..................................................... A. pseudomultiplicatus sp. nov. ♂

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Australian National Insect Collection (AU), University of Palermo (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.