Surveying the Digital Humanities Research Software Engineering Landscape

In 2020, DHTech ran a survey to better understand who is developing code in the digital humanities, including what technologies they use, what formal and informal training they have, and their career expectations and experiences. To understand how the environment for research software engineering practitioners in DH has changed, we repeated the survey in 2025. For DH2025, we submitted this poster that presents the survey results. We retainined some of the original survey questions to enable longitudinal comparisons. This enables us to compare the prevalence of different programming languages and frameworks, the types of technical work that DH developers undertake, and where and in what kinds of teams DH development happens institutionally now versus in 2020. We have also added several new questions to better understand the careers of DH research software engineers and those doing research software engineering work. These new questions include topics such as research output, the disciplines in which DH developers typically work, advancement opportunities, motivations for working within digital humanities, compensation, DH RSE engagement in professional organizations, and code review practices across the community.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15863899
Primary Topic
Flow Experience in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surveying the Digital Humanities Research Software Engineering Landscape

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Flow Experience in Various Fields
article

Surveying the Digital Humanities Research Software Engineering Landscape

article en

Abstract

In 2020, DHTech ran a survey to better understand who is developing code in the digital humanities, including what technologies they use, what formal and informal training they have, and their career expectations and experiences. To understand how the environment for research software engineering practitioners in DH has changed, we repeated the survey in 2025. For DH2025, we submitted this poster that presents the survey results. We retainined some of the original survey questions to enable longitudinal comparisons. This enables us to compare the prevalence of different programming languages and frameworks, the types of technical work that DH developers undertake, and where and in what kinds of teams DH development happens institutionally now versus in 2020. We have also added several new questions to better understand the careers of DH research software engineers and those doing research software engineering work. These new questions include topics such as research output, the disciplines in which DH developers typically work, advancement opportunities, motivations for working within digital humanities, compensation, DH RSE engagement in professional organizations, and code review practices across the community.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Princeton University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Flow Experience in Various Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surveying the Digital Humanities Research Software Engineering Landscape · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS