Pardosa burasantiensis Yin 1997

Pardosa burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976 sensu Yin et al. (1997 b) Figs 9, 10 布拉桑蒂豹蛛 Pardosa burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976: 130, figs 10–12 (♂ ♀); Yin et al. 1997 b: 239, fig. 112 a – g (♂ ♀, misidentified per Kronestedt 2010: 34); Song et al 1999: 330, figs 194 C (♀, misidentified per Kronestedt 2010: 34); Yin et al. 2012: 833, fig. 416 a – g (♂ ♀). Draposa burasantiensis: Dhali et al., 2012: 1202. For complete list of references see WSC (2025). Comments. This species was originally described based on a female holotype and male paratypes collected from Dehradun, Uttar Pradesh, India. Kronestedt (2010) proposed a potential taxonomic reclassification, suggesting that this species might belong to Draposa, based on the presence of a subpaleal sclerite in the illustrated male specimen. However, it should be noted that the figure of the paratype male is rather schematic. Morphological examination of the female holotype indicates characteristics consistent with the nebulosa species group within Pardosa C. L. Koch, 1847. Dhali et al. (2012) transferred two Pardosa species (P. amkhasensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976 and P. burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976) to Draposa, referring to Kronestedt (2010) as justification. However, their work lacked substantial morphological evidence to support this reclassification, providing neither detailed descriptions nor clear images of diagnostic characteristics. Study of the paratype female of this species by Dr Souvik Sen from the Zoological Survey of India (Kronestedt pers. comm.) reveals that it belongs to Pardosa and male paratype is not conspecific with female. Pardosa burasantiensis was first reported from China by Yin et al. (1997 b) and figures provided in their publication refer to Pardosa and most likely not conspecific with the holotype of P. burasantiensis. Therefore, species reported from China does not belong to Draposa. In addition, we hereby reinstate the original taxonomic classification for P. burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16780593
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pardosa burasantiensis Yin 1997

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

Pardosa burasantiensis Yin 1997

article en

Abstract

Pardosa burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976 sensu Yin et al. (1997 b) Figs 9, 10 布拉桑蒂豹蛛 Pardosa burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976: 130, figs 10–12 (♂ ♀); Yin et al. 1997 b: 239, fig. 112 a – g (♂ ♀, misidentified per Kronestedt 2010: 34); Song et al 1999: 330, figs 194 C (♀, misidentified per Kronestedt 2010: 34); Yin et al. 2012: 833, fig. 416 a – g (♂ ♀). Draposa burasantiensis: Dhali et al., 2012: 1202. For complete list of references see WSC (2025). Comments. This species was originally described based on a female holotype and male paratypes collected from Dehradun, Uttar Pradesh, India. Kronestedt (2010) proposed a potential taxonomic reclassification, suggesting that this species might belong to Draposa, based on the presence of a subpaleal sclerite in the illustrated male specimen. However, it should be noted that the figure of the paratype male is rather schematic. Morphological examination of the female holotype indicates characteristics consistent with the nebulosa species group within Pardosa C. L. Koch, 1847. Dhali et al. (2012) transferred two Pardosa species (P. amkhasensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976 and P. burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976) to Draposa, referring to Kronestedt (2010) as justification. However, their work lacked substantial morphological evidence to support this reclassification, providing neither detailed descriptions nor clear images of diagnostic characteristics. Study of the paratype female of this species by Dr Souvik Sen from the Zoological Survey of India (Kronestedt pers. comm.) reveals that it belongs to Pardosa and male paratype is not conspecific with female. Pardosa burasantiensis was first reported from China by Yin et al. (1997 b) and figures provided in their publication refer to Pardosa and most likely not conspecific with the holotype of P. burasantiensis. Therefore, species reported from China does not belong to Draposa. In addition, we hereby reinstate the original taxonomic classification for P. burasantiensis Tikader & Malhotra, 1976.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Southwest University (CN), Anhui Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pardosa burasantiensis Yin 1997 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS