Regulating Ai: Should Governments Create Stricter Ai Laws?

Abstract The ever increasing AI application in surveillance systems, mortuary sciences, automobiles, and finance is accompanied with danger if not contained. This also raises concern for balancing ethical values and basic moral principles. Should stricter laws be placed to govern the use of AI? Was a central question of this paper? It analyzes technology impact assessment within a global context. Having found pervasive and dangerous consequences such as: loss of privacy, infringing ethics, safety compromises, negligence of transparency, violation of algorithm commandments, and machine transgressions. In favor of stringent AI rule regulation argued from public interest included: ethical obligations, prevention of exploitation, and public welfare. Possible counterarguments included: stifling creativity and speed, overly invasive rules, or losing an edge to the rest of the globe. Striking the harmony for all parties through constructive scrutiny favored less restraint when exercising technological boundaries. Affirmative conclusions included progressive intergovernmental cooperation. Proposing AI supervision policy frameworks to ensure pioneering technologies are sensitively and recursively molded into the society test zones. Overall, while one cannot deny there is a need for rules and regulations, spon arbiter burdens need to be deeply woven around pure technical and societal philosophy.