Multi-material additive manufacturing of 316L and 17-4 PH steels: Interface comparison between two distinct technologies

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unique flexibility for designing architectured and complex-shaped parts. While current research largely focuses on optimizing the spatial distribution of material and void, the potential of AM for integrating complex phase or composition distributions within a single component remains largely underexplored. Yet, this approach opens up new pathways for developing composite or functional materials with locally tailored properties. This study explores the fabrication of multi-material parts where one metallic alloy is directly deposited onto another during the additive process, combining two contrasting stainless steels: 316L (austenitic) and 17-4 PH (martensitic). Their similar chemical compositions reduce the risk of brittle intermetallic formation at the interface, while their distinct mechanical properties allow for an effective property trade-off. Two radically different AM processes are compared: an indirect process based on metal extrusion followed by sintering (Metal Extrusion Additive Manufacturing), and a direct wire-based laser fusion process (Wire Laser Additive Manufacturing). The former promotes interfacial bonding through solid-state diffusion, while the latter induces partial dilution between the two materials. Through a multi-scale analysis of porosity distribution, chemical element partitioning, microstructural evolution, and local mechanical properties, we investigate the interfacial characteristics obtained for each process. Particular attention is given to the thickness of the interface, which is controlled by the diffusion behavior specific to each process. This comprehensive approach aims to reveal the key mechanisms governing interfacial behavior and to develop optimized design strategies for multi-material AM. Ultimately, after interface optimization, global mechanical tests such as tensile testing will be carried out as part of future work to evaluate the overall structural performance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15301889
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-material additive manufacturing of 316L and 17-4 PH steels: Interface comparison between two distinct technologies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Multi-material additive manufacturing of 316L and 17-4 PH steels: Interface comparison between two distinct technologies

article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unique flexibility for designing architectured and complex-shaped parts. While current research largely focuses on optimizing the spatial distribution of material and void, the potential of AM for integrating complex phase or composition distributions within a single component remains largely underexplored. Yet, this approach opens up new pathways for developing composite or functional materials with locally tailored properties. This study explores the fabrication of multi-material parts where one metallic alloy is directly deposited onto another during the additive process, combining two contrasting stainless steels: 316L (austenitic) and 17-4 PH (martensitic). Their similar chemical compositions reduce the risk of brittle intermetallic formation at the interface, while their distinct mechanical properties allow for an effective property trade-off. Two radically different AM processes are compared: an indirect process based on metal extrusion followed by sintering (Metal Extrusion Additive Manufacturing), and a direct wire-based laser fusion process (Wire Laser Additive Manufacturing). The former promotes interfacial bonding through solid-state diffusion, while the latter induces partial dilution between the two materials. Through a multi-scale analysis of porosity distribution, chemical element partitioning, microstructural evolution, and local mechanical properties, we investigate the interfacial characteristics obtained for each process. Particular attention is given to the thickness of the interface, which is controlled by the diffusion behavior specific to each process. This comprehensive approach aims to reveal the key mechanisms governing interfacial behavior and to develop optimized design strategies for multi-material AM. Ultimately, after interface optimization, global mechanical tests such as tensile testing will be carried out as part of future work to evaluate the overall structural performance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Science et Ingénierie des Matériaux et Procédés (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences pour la Conception, l'Optimisation et la Production (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.