Multifaceted green areas and forests in changing cities: insights for a socio-ecological evaluation improvement

Urban green spaces (UGS) are continuously developed around the world to deliver multiple benefits. Among UGS, urban forests (UF) planning may be driven by a broad range of benefits such as the need for climate change adaptation, the preservation and creation of habitats, or to enhance people’s connection to nature. Socio-ecological research on UF inherently embraces an interdisciplinary approach to provide insight into cities multidimensional patterns and processes. But the miss-matching between social and ecological observations can create ambiguity in the development and use of clear indicators for sustainable planning. We present an interdisciplinary reflection on socio-ecological research of UF to investigate the socio-cultural dimension in a more epistemologically and methodologically accurate manner respect to the current literature. Indeed, this latter suffers from some important gaps concerning a) lack of balanced engagement of colleagues from different fields; b) limited time to explore new approaches due to research-related time constraints; c) lack of qualitative bottom-up approaches; d) fully integrated analysis of socio-ecological data. Starting from the essential background information, we propose that the system itself should inform methodological approaches with the aim to avoid over-reductionist research and top-down production of knowledge. Moreover, as socio-ecological systems are highly dynamic, the use of multiple spatial and temporal scales can help in strengthening socio-ecological evidence. The implementation of a combined set of socio-ecological variables and indicators within a clear interdisciplinary and bottom-up methodological framework should help in improving future socio-ecological studies and enhance their comparability across cities. We therefore call for an improved understanding of the benefits of socio-ecological approaches, bringing people together to share their knowledge and develop further common protocols.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16007836
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multifaceted green areas and forests in changing cities: insights for a socio-ecological evaluation improvement

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Multifaceted green areas and forests in changing cities: insights for a socio-ecological evaluation improvement

article en

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) are continuously developed around the world to deliver multiple benefits. Among UGS, urban forests (UF) planning may be driven by a broad range of benefits such as the need for climate change adaptation, the preservation and creation of habitats, or to enhance people’s connection to nature. Socio-ecological research on UF inherently embraces an interdisciplinary approach to provide insight into cities multidimensional patterns and processes. But the miss-matching between social and ecological observations can create ambiguity in the development and use of clear indicators for sustainable planning. We present an interdisciplinary reflection on socio-ecological research of UF to investigate the socio-cultural dimension in a more epistemologically and methodologically accurate manner respect to the current literature. Indeed, this latter suffers from some important gaps concerning a) lack of balanced engagement of colleagues from different fields; b) limited time to explore new approaches due to research-related time constraints; c) lack of qualitative bottom-up approaches; d) fully integrated analysis of socio-ecological data. Starting from the essential background information, we propose that the system itself should inform methodological approaches with the aim to avoid over-reductionist research and top-down production of knowledge. Moreover, as socio-ecological systems are highly dynamic, the use of multiple spatial and temporal scales can help in strengthening socio-ecological evidence. The implementation of a combined set of socio-ecological variables and indicators within a clear interdisciplinary and bottom-up methodological framework should help in improving future socio-ecological studies and enhance their comparability across cities. We therefore call for an improved understanding of the benefits of socio-ecological approaches, bringing people together to share their knowledge and develop further common protocols.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of Urbino (IT), Laboratoire Méditerranéen de Préhistoire Europe Afrique (FR), Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.