Expanded Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers for Safety Risk Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Engineering: An Innovative Method for Better Risk Assessment

Safety assessment of urban rail transit (URT) operations plays a crucial role not only in shaping passenger travel choices but also in urban development planning. The findings of such assessments are valuable for both passengers and transport operators. In this study, we propose an integrated multi-stage evaluation framework to assess URT operations from a safety perspective. This framework considers decision-makers' (DMs') risk preferences and the uncertainty of available information. We employ two key methods: the CRITIC method to determine the weights of evaluation criteria and the MOORA method to rank the alternatives. Both methods operate within the framework of triangular fuzzy neutrosophic sets (TFNSs) to handle uncertainty and imprecise data. Our evaluation includes nine criteria and six alternatives, assessed by four experts and decision-makers. The results indicate that Structural Integrity is the most critical criterion, having the highest weight in the evaluation process.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14834585
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanded Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers for Safety Risk Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Engineering: An Innovative Method for Better Risk Assessment

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Expanded Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers for Safety Risk Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Engineering: An Innovative Method for Better Risk Assessment

article en

Abstract

Safety assessment of urban rail transit (URT) operations plays a crucial role not only in shaping passenger travel choices but also in urban development planning. The findings of such assessments are valuable for both passengers and transport operators. In this study, we propose an integrated multi-stage evaluation framework to assess URT operations from a safety perspective. This framework considers decision-makers' (DMs') risk preferences and the uncertainty of available information. We employ two key methods: the CRITIC method to determine the weights of evaluation criteria and the MOORA method to rank the alternatives. Both methods operate within the framework of triangular fuzzy neutrosophic sets (TFNSs) to handle uncertainty and imprecise data. Our evaluation includes nine criteria and six alternatives, assessed by four experts and decision-makers. The results indicate that Structural Integrity is the most critical criterion, having the highest weight in the evaluation process.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.