De-noising and super-resolution of experimental velocity measurements by optimizing a discrete loss (ODIL)

Abstract: This article presents a comparison between two techniques optimising a discrete loss (ODIL) and physics informed neural networks (PINN) for reconstructing the velocity field from low resolution and noisy planar PIV measurements. Both techniques are capable of accurately reconstructing the velocity and pressure fields from low resolution and noisy velocity measurements sampled from 2D numerical simulations. Both techniques provide reasonable reconstruction of the in-plane velocity components when provided with two-component velocity measurements in a single plane sampled from a 3D numerical simulation. However, ODIL generally over-fits to any noise in the measurement data, while PINN may under-fit the data, and not reconstruct small-scale flow structures. In all cases, ODIL requires fewer training epochs and less wall-time than PINN to produce results of similar accuracy. Keywords: machine learning, data assimilation, flow reconstruction

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14213600
Primary Topic
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-noising and super-resolution of experimental velocity measurements by optimizing a discrete loss (ODIL)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
article

De-noising and super-resolution of experimental velocity measurements by optimizing a discrete loss (ODIL)

article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article presents a comparison between two techniques optimising a discrete loss (ODIL) and physics informed neural networks (PINN) for reconstructing the velocity field from low resolution and noisy planar PIV measurements. Both techniques are capable of accurately reconstructing the velocity and pressure fields from low resolution and noisy velocity measurements sampled from 2D numerical simulations. Both techniques provide reasonable reconstruction of the in-plane velocity components when provided with two-component velocity measurements in a single plane sampled from a 3D numerical simulation. However, ODIL generally over-fits to any noise in the measurement data, while PINN may under-fit the data, and not reconstruct small-scale flow structures. In all cases, ODIL requires fewer training epochs and less wall-time than PINN to produce results of similar accuracy. Keywords: machine learning, data assimilation, flow reconstruction

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.