Bias and Fairness in Healthcare AI: Addressing Algorithmic Disparities in Underrepresented Populations

Modern applications of medical artificial intelligence offer unparalleled opportunities for revolutionizing clinical practice via enhanced diagnostic features and improved treatment protocols. Nonetheless, new evidence shows worrying computational disparities that disproportionately impact marginalized communities across various demographic factors. Discriminatory biases in medical AI systems establish systematic health care inequalities, particularly affecting minority patients due to diminished diagnostic accuracy and weakened treatment suggestions. The fundamental framework of discrimination in healthcare AI consists of various interrelated elements, including biases in historical datasets, frameworks of institutional bias, and insufficient justice considerations throughout the algorithm development processes. Recognition methodologies range from statistical parity evaluations to intersectional bias identification procedures, with community-driven social media initiatives proving crucial in exposing discriminatory patterns overlooked by standard evaluation techniques. Effective remediation strategies require comprehensive methodologies addressing discrimination during data preprocessing, model development, and output calibration stages through dataset diversification, synthetic data creation, and equity-centered optimization approaches. Evaluation systems must simultaneously measure clinical efficacy and algorithmic justice across diverse patient populations while incorporating continuous monitoring protocols to identify emerging discriminatory trends during deployment periods.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16226135
Primary Topic
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias and Fairness in Healthcare AI: Addressing Algorithmic Disparities in Underrepresented Populations

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
article

Bias and Fairness in Healthcare AI: Addressing Algorithmic Disparities in Underrepresented Populations

article en

Abstract

Modern applications of medical artificial intelligence offer unparalleled opportunities for revolutionizing clinical practice via enhanced diagnostic features and improved treatment protocols. Nonetheless, new evidence shows worrying computational disparities that disproportionately impact marginalized communities across various demographic factors. Discriminatory biases in medical AI systems establish systematic health care inequalities, particularly affecting minority patients due to diminished diagnostic accuracy and weakened treatment suggestions. The fundamental framework of discrimination in healthcare AI consists of various interrelated elements, including biases in historical datasets, frameworks of institutional bias, and insufficient justice considerations throughout the algorithm development processes. Recognition methodologies range from statistical parity evaluations to intersectional bias identification procedures, with community-driven social media initiatives proving crucial in exposing discriminatory patterns overlooked by standard evaluation techniques. Effective remediation strategies require comprehensive methodologies addressing discrimination during data preprocessing, model development, and output calibration stages through dataset diversification, synthetic data creation, and equity-centered optimization approaches. Evaluation systems must simultaneously measure clinical efficacy and algorithmic justice across diverse patient populations while incorporating continuous monitoring protocols to identify emerging discriminatory trends during deployment periods.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Golden Gate University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.