CLOPIDOGREL MONOTHERAPY TO TREAT DOUBLE-RISK ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND ALSO SHOW DIFFERENCE CLOPIDOGREL VS DAPT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITH HIGH BLEEDING RISK

Background: Acute Coronary Syndrome or ACS is a medical condition which includes increased risk of ischemic terminologies. This standard type of therapy often includes Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or DAPT, it comprises of aspirin and some inhibitors like P2Y12 such as clopidogrel. Moreover, that DAPT increases risk of bleeding, it includes those patients who have specially both high ischemic and bleeding risks, we also named them as double-risk patients. Some recent studies demonstrate that it is proposed of clopidogrel monotherapy which work as a potentially and conditionally safer alternative in this population. Aims: This article aims to examine out the effectiveness and safe way of clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with double-risk or ACS patients. It compares out some terms between clopidogrel monotherapy and DAPT in those patients which includes high ischemic or poor supply of oxygen and blood and also bleeding risk issues. Methodology: A systematic and research based studies show that meta-analysis of some randomized controlled trials and other observational studies which were collected from major medical databases and it were conducted among these patients. That data was extracted on some major and adverse cardiovascular events, other bleeding events and increased rate of mortality. Results: Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with some superior rates of MACE by comparing it to DAPT in selection of high-risk populations, while it is significantly reducing some major bleeding incidents. Moreover, selection criteria of patient’s and timing of therapy cessation were harsh to determine and also other determinants of clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This Clopidogrel monotherapy presents some other workable options for double-risk of patients with ACS, it offers a balance between protection of thrombotic nerve and increased risk of bleeding. Other large-scale studies are necessary to refine patient’s selection and it optimize its therapeutic strategies. Keywords: syndrome, therapeutic, thrombotic, nerve impulse.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15304126
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLOPIDOGREL MONOTHERAPY TO TREAT DOUBLE-RISK ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND ALSO SHOW DIFFERENCE CLOPIDOGREL VS DAPT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITH HIGH BLEEDING RISK

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

CLOPIDOGREL MONOTHERAPY TO TREAT DOUBLE-RISK ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND ALSO SHOW DIFFERENCE CLOPIDOGREL VS DAPT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITH HIGH BLEEDING RISK

article en

Abstract

Background: Acute Coronary Syndrome or ACS is a medical condition which includes increased risk of ischemic terminologies. This standard type of therapy often includes Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or DAPT, it comprises of aspirin and some inhibitors like P2Y12 such as clopidogrel. Moreover, that DAPT increases risk of bleeding, it includes those patients who have specially both high ischemic and bleeding risks, we also named them as double-risk patients. Some recent studies demonstrate that it is proposed of clopidogrel monotherapy which work as a potentially and conditionally safer alternative in this population. Aims: This article aims to examine out the effectiveness and safe way of clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with double-risk or ACS patients. It compares out some terms between clopidogrel monotherapy and DAPT in those patients which includes high ischemic or poor supply of oxygen and blood and also bleeding risk issues. Methodology: A systematic and research based studies show that meta-analysis of some randomized controlled trials and other observational studies which were collected from major medical databases and it were conducted among these patients. That data was extracted on some major and adverse cardiovascular events, other bleeding events and increased rate of mortality. Results: Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with some superior rates of MACE by comparing it to DAPT in selection of high-risk populations, while it is significantly reducing some major bleeding incidents. Moreover, selection criteria of patient’s and timing of therapy cessation were harsh to determine and also other determinants of clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This Clopidogrel monotherapy presents some other workable options for double-risk of patients with ACS, it offers a balance between protection of thrombotic nerve and increased risk of bleeding. Other large-scale studies are necessary to refine patient’s selection and it optimize its therapeutic strategies. Keywords: syndrome, therapeutic, thrombotic, nerve impulse.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CLOPIDOGREL MONOTHERAPY TO TREAT DOUBLE-RISK ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND ALSO SHOW DIFFERENCE CLOPIDOGREL VS DAPT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITH HIGH BLEEDING RISK · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS