Comparison of Problem-Based Learning Model with Direct Instruction in Mathematics Learning Towards the Development of Critical Thinking Skills

Abstract : The selection and application of learning models to develop critical thinking skills is a problem in learning mathematics in elementary schools. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between Problem Based Learning model and Direct Instruction model in mathematics learning on the development of critical thinking skills. This research is a quasi – experimental research, using quantitative data analysis and sampling using cluster random sampling. Data collection with tests. Data analysis of this research includes: prerequisite analysis test, two-way variance analysis test of unequal cells, and further analysis of variance test. The results of the calculation of the analysis of variance test of two-way unequal cells obtained data that Fcount (5.36) > Ftable (3.91), and in the Anava further test, obtained data that the marginal mean of the Problem Based Learning model is 88.58 greater than the Direct Instruction model which has a mean of 80.05. The conclusion of the research is that the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning model is better than the Direct Instruction model in developing critical thinking.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15355125
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Problem-Based Learning Model with Direct Instruction in Mathematics Learning Towards the Development of Critical Thinking Skills

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Educational Methods and Outcomes
article

Comparison of Problem-Based Learning Model with Direct Instruction in Mathematics Learning Towards the Development of Critical Thinking Skills

article en

Abstract

Abstract : The selection and application of learning models to develop critical thinking skills is a problem in learning mathematics in elementary schools. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between Problem Based Learning model and Direct Instruction model in mathematics learning on the development of critical thinking skills. This research is a quasi – experimental research, using quantitative data analysis and sampling using cluster random sampling. Data collection with tests. Data analysis of this research includes: prerequisite analysis test, two-way variance analysis test of unequal cells, and further analysis of variance test. The results of the calculation of the analysis of variance test of two-way unequal cells obtained data that Fcount (5.36) > Ftable (3.91), and in the Anava further test, obtained data that the marginal mean of the Problem Based Learning model is 88.58 greater than the Direct Instruction model which has a mean of 80.05. The conclusion of the research is that the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning model is better than the Direct Instruction model in developing critical thinking.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Educational Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.