Jujubinus montagui

Jujubinus montagui (Wood, 1828) (Fig. 4G 1-G 3) Trochus montagui W. Wood, 1828: pl. 6, fig. 43. Jujubinus montagui – Caprotti 1976: pl. 7, fig. 10. — Graham 1988: 120, fig. 39. — Poppe & Goto 1991: 83, pl. 8, fig. 9. — Landau et al. 2003: 44, pl. 10, fig. 1. — Chirli 2004: 81, pl. 33, figs 9-16. — Pouwer & Wesselingh 2012: 159, figs 27-29. Jujubinus (Jujubinus) montagui – Cavallo & Repetto 1992: 42, fig. 37. MATERIAL AND DIMENSIONS. — Maximum height 7.0 mm (incomplete), width 7.2 mm. — RGM.1365068 (1), leg. AWJ; RGM.1365179 (1), leg. AWJ. SPECIES CHARACTERISATION. — Shell trochiform; protoconch and early teleoconch whorls not preserved; last two whorls weakly convex, separated by moderately deeply impressed suture; sculpture of seven to eight irregular, flattened spiral cords; axial sculpture of fine, close-set axial growth lamellae present only in the interspaces; base flattened bearing seven concentric cords; columella short, oblique, curved, bearing stout columellar fold delimiting siphonal fasciole. DISTRIBUTION. — Lower Pliocene: central Mediterranean, Italy (Chirli 2004). — Upper Pliocene: western Mediterranean, Estepona Basin, Spain (Landau et al. 2003); central Mediterranean, Italy (Caprotti 1976; Cavallo & Repetto 1992). — Upper Pleistocene: southern North Sea Basin (Pouwer & Wesselingh 2012). — Present-day: Atlantic, Orkneys south into the western Mediterranean, 5-200 m deep, mainly on gravel bottoms (Poppe & Goto 1991).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14850551
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jujubinus montagui

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
article

Jujubinus montagui

article en

Abstract

Jujubinus montagui (Wood, 1828) (Fig. 4G 1-G 3) Trochus montagui W. Wood, 1828: pl. 6, fig. 43. Jujubinus montagui – Caprotti 1976: pl. 7, fig. 10. — Graham 1988: 120, fig. 39. — Poppe & Goto 1991: 83, pl. 8, fig. 9. — Landau et al. 2003: 44, pl. 10, fig. 1. — Chirli 2004: 81, pl. 33, figs 9-16. — Pouwer & Wesselingh 2012: 159, figs 27-29. Jujubinus (Jujubinus) montagui – Cavallo & Repetto 1992: 42, fig. 37. MATERIAL AND DIMENSIONS. — Maximum height 7.0 mm (incomplete), width 7.2 mm. — RGM.1365068 (1), leg. AWJ; RGM.1365179 (1), leg. AWJ. SPECIES CHARACTERISATION. — Shell trochiform; protoconch and early teleoconch whorls not preserved; last two whorls weakly convex, separated by moderately deeply impressed suture; sculpture of seven to eight irregular, flattened spiral cords; axial sculpture of fine, close-set axial growth lamellae present only in the interspaces; base flattened bearing seven concentric cords; columella short, oblique, curved, bearing stout columellar fold delimiting siphonal fasciole. DISTRIBUTION. — Lower Pliocene: central Mediterranean, Italy (Chirli 2004). — Upper Pliocene: western Mediterranean, Estepona Basin, Spain (Landau et al. 2003); central Mediterranean, Italy (Caprotti 1976; Cavallo & Repetto 1992). — Upper Pleistocene: southern North Sea Basin (Pouwer & Wesselingh 2012). — Present-day: Atlantic, Orkneys south into the western Mediterranean, 5-200 m deep, mainly on gravel bottoms (Poppe & Goto 1991).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Université de Rennes (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.