A comparison of the retentive ability of various denture adhesives on different denture base materials: an in vitro study.

Abstract Statement of Problem: Given the variety of denture adhesives and base resins available, it is critical that dentists suggest the right ones to their patients. Purpose: In addition to subjectively assessing and contrasting the retentive qualities of various denture adhesives, this study aims to explore the subtleties of how they interact with various denture base materials. Material and Methods: Three denture base materials—DPI, Lucitone, and Trevalon—were used to evaluate Polident, Fixon, Fixon Super Grip, and Secure. The control was artificial saliva. By assessing the adhesion and cohesion that formed between a glass surface and an acrylic resin disc surface after adhesives were applied between them, the retentive capacity of the denture adhesives was evaluated. Tukey's post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used to assess the significance of the mean results. Results: The highest retention recorded for denture base resins in their decreasing order: DPI with Polident + Saliva (Mean=854.390 gms), Trevalon with Polident + Saliva (Mean=821.890 gms) & Lucitone with Secure + Saliva (Mean=711.890). Conclusions: Polident with Saliva and DPI denture base resin showed the highest retention. The mean retention of denture adhesives was higher when they were tested along with artificial saliva rather than alone. The adhesives with cream consistency showed higher mean retention than the powder consistency. Keywords- Denture adhesives, Denture Base, Fixon, Polident, Retention.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14545608
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of the retentive ability of various denture adhesives on different denture base materials: an in vitro study.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

A comparison of the retentive ability of various denture adhesives on different denture base materials: an in vitro study.

article en

Abstract

Abstract Statement of Problem: Given the variety of denture adhesives and base resins available, it is critical that dentists suggest the right ones to their patients. Purpose: In addition to subjectively assessing and contrasting the retentive qualities of various denture adhesives, this study aims to explore the subtleties of how they interact with various denture base materials. Material and Methods: Three denture base materials—DPI, Lucitone, and Trevalon—were used to evaluate Polident, Fixon, Fixon Super Grip, and Secure. The control was artificial saliva. By assessing the adhesion and cohesion that formed between a glass surface and an acrylic resin disc surface after adhesives were applied between them, the retentive capacity of the denture adhesives was evaluated. Tukey's post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used to assess the significance of the mean results. Results: The highest retention recorded for denture base resins in their decreasing order: DPI with Polident + Saliva (Mean=854.390 gms), Trevalon with Polident + Saliva (Mean=821.890 gms) & Lucitone with Secure + Saliva (Mean=711.890). Conclusions: Polident with Saliva and DPI denture base resin showed the highest retention. The mean retention of denture adhesives was higher when they were tested along with artificial saliva rather than alone. The adhesives with cream consistency showed higher mean retention than the powder consistency. Keywords- Denture adhesives, Denture Base, Fixon, Polident, Retention.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
MNR Dental College and Hospital (IN), Govt. Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.