Monilea Swainson 1840

Genus Monilea Swainson, 1840 Monilea Swainson, 1840: 220, 350. Type species Trochus calliferus Lamarck, 1822 (monotypy), Recent, Indo-West Pacific. Remarks The taxonomy of the genus Monilea is complex and in need of revision – much remains unresolved. If illustrated at all, the original figures of the species described in the 19 th century were frequently poor. As a consequence, use of these names in more recent literature has lacked authority and many have been used inconsistenly. Rarely was there evidence that the type material had been consulted and more recent authors have simply followed earlier authors in applying names. This situation is further exacerbated by the fact that recent illustrations often present the shell in apertural view only, which does not show critical features of umbilical morphology. Some of the species currently referred to Monilea (MolluscaBase 2024) belong instead to Talopena, which I consider to be a distinct genus. This issue is discussed further under the Remarks for Talopena (below) where I provide illustrations of the holotypes of the type species of both genera (Fig. 34) and detail the characters which set them apart. None of the New Caledonian material examined is referable to Monilea.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14440312
Primary Topic
Transgenic Plants and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monilea Swainson 1840

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Transgenic Plants and Applications
article

Monilea Swainson 1840

article en

Abstract

Genus Monilea Swainson, 1840 Monilea Swainson, 1840: 220, 350. Type species Trochus calliferus Lamarck, 1822 (monotypy), Recent, Indo-West Pacific. Remarks The taxonomy of the genus Monilea is complex and in need of revision – much remains unresolved. If illustrated at all, the original figures of the species described in the 19 th century were frequently poor. As a consequence, use of these names in more recent literature has lacked authority and many have been used inconsistenly. Rarely was there evidence that the type material had been consulted and more recent authors have simply followed earlier authors in applying names. This situation is further exacerbated by the fact that recent illustrations often present the shell in apertural view only, which does not show critical features of umbilical morphology. Some of the species currently referred to Monilea (MolluscaBase 2024) belong instead to Talopena, which I consider to be a distinct genus. This issue is discussed further under the Remarks for Talopena (below) where I provide illustrations of the holotypes of the type species of both genera (Fig. 34) and detail the characters which set them apart. None of the New Caledonian material examined is referable to Monilea.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (FR), National Museum Wales (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Transgenic Plants and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.