Recycling Roots in South Cushitic: An account of a prolific creative process

It has been observed that, compared with cognates shared across other branches of Cushitic, the South Cushitic languages share comparatively fewer cognates with wider Cushitic. This has been often examined through appealing to language contact: the South Cushitic languages share fewer cognates with wider Cushitic because South Cushitic has borrowed forms from non-Cushitic languages including Nilotic, Bantu, as well as various members of the disparate and archaic group Early East African. This talk looks at another source of this mismatch, that being prolific word formation via other roots. Noted throughout Kießling and Mous (2003), and examined in Harvey (2018), the South Cushitic languages share fewer cognates with wider Cushitic because a large volume of its lexical forms are based upon the same root. This talk 1) provides the basic pattern for such word formation, 2) displays numerous examples, and 3) entertains some practical ramifications of this creative process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14261453
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Resources Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling Roots in South Cushitic: An account of a prolific creative process

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Water Quality and Resources Studies
article

Recycling Roots in South Cushitic: An account of a prolific creative process

article en

Abstract

It has been observed that, compared with cognates shared across other branches of Cushitic, the South Cushitic languages share comparatively fewer cognates with wider Cushitic. This has been often examined through appealing to language contact: the South Cushitic languages share fewer cognates with wider Cushitic because South Cushitic has borrowed forms from non-Cushitic languages including Nilotic, Bantu, as well as various members of the disparate and archaic group Early East African. This talk looks at another source of this mismatch, that being prolific word formation via other roots. Noted throughout Kießling and Mous (2003), and examined in Harvey (2018), the South Cushitic languages share fewer cognates with wider Cushitic because a large volume of its lexical forms are based upon the same root. This talk 1) provides the basic pattern for such word formation, 2) displays numerous examples, and 3) entertains some practical ramifications of this creative process.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Water Quality and Resources Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.