Rethinking Rigor: Towards a Consortium of Benchmarking Initiatives to Validate AI Models in Biomedicine

The explosive growth of data-driven artificial intelligence in biomedicine is reshaping the scientific landscape, powering innovative healthcare solutions and transformative insights in life sciences. AI is proving to be a new paradigm for predictive modeling, which in turn demands a paradigm shift in our approach to model evaluation. Traditional algorithmic performance metrics alone are insufficient for comprehensive validation. Concurrent with the rise of AI modeling opportunities has been a proliferation of community-led benchmarking initiatives, fragmenting efforts and limiting their collective synergy and impact. This talk proposes fostering a coalition of Critical Assessment efforts. Such a coalition can enhance collaboration, establish rigorous validation standards, and build sustained trust in evolving AI methodologies, ensuring their robust and reliable integration into biomedical research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15328513
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Rigor: Towards a Consortium of Benchmarking Initiatives to Validate AI Models in Biomedicine

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Rethinking Rigor: Towards a Consortium of Benchmarking Initiatives to Validate AI Models in Biomedicine

article en

Abstract

The explosive growth of data-driven artificial intelligence in biomedicine is reshaping the scientific landscape, powering innovative healthcare solutions and transformative insights in life sciences. AI is proving to be a new paradigm for predictive modeling, which in turn demands a paradigm shift in our approach to model evaluation. Traditional algorithmic performance metrics alone are insufficient for comprehensive validation. Concurrent with the rise of AI modeling opportunities has been a proliferation of community-led benchmarking initiatives, fragmenting efforts and limiting their collective synergy and impact. This talk proposes fostering a coalition of Critical Assessment efforts. Such a coalition can enhance collaboration, establish rigorous validation standards, and build sustained trust in evolving AI methodologies, ensuring their robust and reliable integration into biomedical research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
New York University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.