DFAS-PAG (V1.0): PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine — Embedding Sovereignty, Explainability, and Enforceability Beyond Ethics-Washing

This manuscript introduces the DFAS-PAG (PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine), a forward-thinking framework addressing the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and public authority. It critically examines the structural, legal, and ethical challenges arising from AI integration in public sector decision-making, with a specific focus on sovereignty, accountability, explainability, and institutional resilience. The work identifies key vulnerabilities in current governance models—particularly in relation to algorithmic opacity, vendor dependency, and the erosion of localized control—arguing that traditional ethics-based approaches are insufficient. Instead, it advocates for enforceable, sovereign-aligned mechanisms that preserve democratic oversight and institutional integrity in the face of increasing automation. The manuscript contributes to global discourse on AI governance by highlighting the need for actionable doctrines that align technological progress with public trust, operational legitimacy, and systemic transparency.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16420461
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DFAS-PAG (V1.0): PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine — Embedding Sovereignty, Explainability, and Enforceability Beyond Ethics-Washing

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
article

DFAS-PAG (V1.0): PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine — Embedding Sovereignty, Explainability, and Enforceability Beyond Ethics-Washing

article en

Abstract

This manuscript introduces the DFAS-PAG (PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine), a forward-thinking framework addressing the growing intersection between artificial intelligence and public authority. It critically examines the structural, legal, and ethical challenges arising from AI integration in public sector decision-making, with a specific focus on sovereignty, accountability, explainability, and institutional resilience. The work identifies key vulnerabilities in current governance models—particularly in relation to algorithmic opacity, vendor dependency, and the erosion of localized control—arguing that traditional ethics-based approaches are insufficient. Instead, it advocates for enforceable, sovereign-aligned mechanisms that preserve democratic oversight and institutional integrity in the face of increasing automation. The manuscript contributes to global discourse on AI governance by highlighting the need for actionable doctrines that align technological progress with public trust, operational legitimacy, and systemic transparency.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DFAS-PAG (V1.0): PostObjective Autonomy Governance Doctrine — Embedding Sovereignty, Explainability, and Enforceability Beyond Ethics-Washing · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS