Gravity, Entropy, and Spacetime Jacobson vs. Multifaceted Coherence (MC)
This paper explores two distinct frameworks for understanding the relationship between gravity, entropy, and spacetime: Jacobson's thermodynamic interpretation and the Multifaceted Coherence (MC) model. Jacobson's approach, first proposed in 1995, connects gravity to thermodynamics through the Clausius relation, offering a way to derive Einstein's field equations from the first law of thermodynamics. In this view, gravity emerges from the thermodynamic behavior near black holes, where entropy plays a key role in shaping gravitational phenomena. In contrast, the MC model takes a more foundational approach, positing that both gravity and entropy are emergent properties stemming from the breakdown of quantum coherence within spacetime. In the MC framework, gravity is not a fundamental force but a geometric consequence of coherence gradients in the quantum field. The loss of coherence leads to entropy, which increases as the system transitions from a state of order to one of disorder. Gravity and entropy, in this context, emerge from the informational dynamics of quantum fields rather than from thermodynamic laws alone. Through a comparative analysis, this paper highlights the core principles of both approaches, examining their similarities, differences, and implications for our understanding of gravity and spacetime. While Jacobson's thermodynamic view offers a compelling explanation in the context of black holes, the MC model provides a broader framework for understanding the emergence of gravitational phenomena from quantum coherence degradation. The paper concludes by discussing the potential for integrating these two perspectives to form a more comprehensive theory of gravity and entropy in the universe
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-05-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15478868
- Primary Topic
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00