Comparison of Hemoglobin Trends in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure for managing end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Robotic-assisted TKA has been introduced to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. This study aims to compare perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) trends between robotic-assisted and conventional TKA, with a focus on differences between unilateral and bilateral procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TKA, categorized into robotic-assisted and conventional groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for unilateral and bilateral procedures. Preoperative and postoperative Hb levels on Days 1, 2, and 3 were recorded. The mean Hb drop from preoperative levels to postoperative Day 3 (POD3) was calculated for each group. Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests and ANOVA, were used to compare Hb drops between the groups. Results: The study included 184 patients: 37 in the robotic-assisted group and 147 in the conventional group. The mean Hb drop from preoperative to POD3 was 2.56 ± 0.99 g/dL in the robotic-assisted group and 2.41 ± 1.12 g/dL in the conventional group (p = 0.428). In subgroup analyses, the mean Hb drop was 2.60 ± 1.00 g/dL for unilateral robotic-assisted TKA, 2.50 ± 0.98 g/dL for bilateral robotic-assisted TKA, 2.35 ± 1.10 g/dL for unilateral conventional TKA, and 2.50 ± 1.15 g/dL for bilateral conventional TKA. No statistically significant differences were found between unilateral and bilateral procedures within each group. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA does not significantly reduce perioperative blood loss compared to conventional TKA, regardless of whether the procedure is unilateral or bilateral. Both approaches result in comparable Hb trends postoperatively. Bilateral TKR induces a greater cumulative Hb drop than unilateral TKR, with significant recovery beginning on POD 3. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings and explore other potential benefits of robotic assistance in TKA.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15261171
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Hemoglobin Trends in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Comparison of Hemoglobin Trends in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure for managing end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Robotic-assisted TKA has been introduced to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. This study aims to compare perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) trends between robotic-assisted and conventional TKA, with a focus on differences between unilateral and bilateral procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TKA, categorized into robotic-assisted and conventional groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for unilateral and bilateral procedures. Preoperative and postoperative Hb levels on Days 1, 2, and 3 were recorded. The mean Hb drop from preoperative levels to postoperative Day 3 (POD3) was calculated for each group. Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests and ANOVA, were used to compare Hb drops between the groups. Results: The study included 184 patients: 37 in the robotic-assisted group and 147 in the conventional group. The mean Hb drop from preoperative to POD3 was 2.56 ± 0.99 g/dL in the robotic-assisted group and 2.41 ± 1.12 g/dL in the conventional group (p = 0.428). In subgroup analyses, the mean Hb drop was 2.60 ± 1.00 g/dL for unilateral robotic-assisted TKA, 2.50 ± 0.98 g/dL for bilateral robotic-assisted TKA, 2.35 ± 1.10 g/dL for unilateral conventional TKA, and 2.50 ± 1.15 g/dL for bilateral conventional TKA. No statistically significant differences were found between unilateral and bilateral procedures within each group. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA does not significantly reduce perioperative blood loss compared to conventional TKA, regardless of whether the procedure is unilateral or bilateral. Both approaches result in comparable Hb trends postoperatively. Bilateral TKR induces a greater cumulative Hb drop than unilateral TKR, with significant recovery beginning on POD 3. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings and explore other potential benefits of robotic assistance in TKA.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovative Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.