Progressing Research on Basic Education

This study explored the implementation of Division Research Program PROBE (Progressing Research On Basic Education) on its third and last year and investigated the utilization of contextualized action research guidebook. A quantitative research method employing descriptive approach was utilized in the study. Participants were research leaders in the division which were selected purposively. Results showed that in terms of development (M=3.850, SD=0.499) and utilization (M=3.650, SD=0.421) of contextualized action research guidebook, majority of participants agreed that it was “highly desirable”. Moreover, Participants perceived that the material is “highly acceptable” in terms of content (M=3.950, SD=0.480), usability (M=3.850, SD=0.455), and quality (M=3.750, SD=0.409). Lastly, in its effectiveness (M=3.800, SD=0.137), participants agreed that the contextualized action research guidebook is “highly effective”. There were limitations in the conduct of the study such as difficulty understanding technical terminologies and crafting research at their own pace. Nonetheless, participants realized the significance of the implementation of the Division Research Program and the use of contextualized action research guidebook towards easier and more accessible process of crafting action research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14718565
Primary Topic
Immune Response and Inflammation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progressing Research on Basic Education

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Immune Response and Inflammation
article

Progressing Research on Basic Education

article en

Abstract

This study explored the implementation of Division Research Program PROBE (Progressing Research On Basic Education) on its third and last year and investigated the utilization of contextualized action research guidebook. A quantitative research method employing descriptive approach was utilized in the study. Participants were research leaders in the division which were selected purposively. Results showed that in terms of development (M=3.850, SD=0.499) and utilization (M=3.650, SD=0.421) of contextualized action research guidebook, majority of participants agreed that it was “highly desirable”. Moreover, Participants perceived that the material is “highly acceptable” in terms of content (M=3.950, SD=0.480), usability (M=3.850, SD=0.455), and quality (M=3.750, SD=0.409). Lastly, in its effectiveness (M=3.800, SD=0.137), participants agreed that the contextualized action research guidebook is “highly effective”. There were limitations in the conduct of the study such as difficulty understanding technical terminologies and crafting research at their own pace. Nonetheless, participants realized the significance of the implementation of the Division Research Program and the use of contextualized action research guidebook towards easier and more accessible process of crafting action research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
De La Salle University (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Immune Response and Inflammation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.