POSSIBLE ABUSES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE STUDY PROCESS

As part of the project Use of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in the Course, Leadership and Organisation of Media Production at FUDŠ, we conducted a study to identify potential abuses of artificial intelligence in the study process. The findings indicate that students are aware of potential abuses of AI in the study process and propose specific measures to limit or prevent such behaviour, as it could negatively affect the academic process and create disparities among students. Students believe that those who abuse AI are primarily motivated by a lack of time, low levels of knowledge, or limited motivation. The main forms of abuse include creating content that students present as their own, generating assignments without understanding the material, and cheating during exams. To address these challenges, students suggest that institutions should establish guidelines and rules for the use of AI in the study process, implement programmes to raise awareness about the ethical use of artificial intelligence, use appropriate tools to detect AI abuse, and introduce sanctions where necessary. Additionally, they recommend adapting knowledge assessment methods to focus more on oral exams, practical assignments, and projects that foster creativity and require independent critical thinking.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15109924
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POSSIBLE ABUSES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE STUDY PROCESS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

POSSIBLE ABUSES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE STUDY PROCESS

article en

Abstract

As part of the project Use of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in the Course, Leadership and Organisation of Media Production at FUDŠ, we conducted a study to identify potential abuses of artificial intelligence in the study process. The findings indicate that students are aware of potential abuses of AI in the study process and propose specific measures to limit or prevent such behaviour, as it could negatively affect the academic process and create disparities among students. Students believe that those who abuse AI are primarily motivated by a lack of time, low levels of knowledge, or limited motivation. The main forms of abuse include creating content that students present as their own, generating assignments without understanding the material, and cheating during exams. To address these challenges, students suggest that institutions should establish guidelines and rules for the use of AI in the study process, implement programmes to raise awareness about the ethical use of artificial intelligence, use appropriate tools to detect AI abuse, and introduce sanctions where necessary. Additionally, they recommend adapting knowledge assessment methods to focus more on oral exams, practical assignments, and projects that foster creativity and require independent critical thinking.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.