Examination of Forms of Price Fixing and Cartels in India

The Preamble to the Indian Constitution states that- “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, havingsolemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULARDEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:JUSTICE, social, economic and political.LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.EQUALITY of status and of opportunity and to promote among them allFRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November 1949, do HEREBYADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”1It is a reflection of the core constitutional values and declares India to be a Sovereign, Socialist,Secular, Democratic, Republic committed to Justice, Equality and Liberty for the people. Theobjective of the Competition Act, 2002, also reflects the same core values as our IndianConstitution. It clearly states the following objectives:• to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition.• to promote and sustain competition in markets.• to protect the interests of consumers.• to ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets, in India, andfor matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.It is here to be noted that prior to the Competition Act, 2002, the Monopolies and Restrictive TradePractices (MRTP) Act, 1969, was the first piece of legislation to deal with antitrust law in Indiaand to restraint the abuse of market power. However, at the wake of globalization, liberalizationand privatization the MRTP Act, 1969 was considered as obsolete and was replaced by theCompetition Act, 2002, on the recommendation of the Raghavan Committee.The Competition Act, 2002, as amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, or theMRTP Act, 1969, were however not the first piece of legislation to deal with the antitrust lawglobally nor did it first originate in India. The antitrust law was for the very first time developedin the United States in the late nineteenth C.E.2.In this paper we will be making a detailed comparison between USA and India with respect toPrice Fixing, the related legislations and the agencies dealing with such issues in their respectivejurisdiction.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15209112
Primary Topic
Legal case studies and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of Forms of Price Fixing and Cartels in India

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal case studies and regulations
article

Examination of Forms of Price Fixing and Cartels in India

article en

Abstract

The Preamble to the Indian Constitution states that- “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, havingsolemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULARDEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:JUSTICE, social, economic and political.LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.EQUALITY of status and of opportunity and to promote among them allFRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November 1949, do HEREBYADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”1It is a reflection of the core constitutional values and declares India to be a Sovereign, Socialist,Secular, Democratic, Republic committed to Justice, Equality and Liberty for the people. Theobjective of the Competition Act, 2002, also reflects the same core values as our IndianConstitution. It clearly states the following objectives:• to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition.• to promote and sustain competition in markets.• to protect the interests of consumers.• to ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets, in India, andfor matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.It is here to be noted that prior to the Competition Act, 2002, the Monopolies and Restrictive TradePractices (MRTP) Act, 1969, was the first piece of legislation to deal with antitrust law in Indiaand to restraint the abuse of market power. However, at the wake of globalization, liberalizationand privatization the MRTP Act, 1969 was considered as obsolete and was replaced by theCompetition Act, 2002, on the recommendation of the Raghavan Committee.The Competition Act, 2002, as amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, or theMRTP Act, 1969, were however not the first piece of legislation to deal with the antitrust lawglobally nor did it first originate in India. The antitrust law was for the very first time developedin the United States in the late nineteenth C.E.2.In this paper we will be making a detailed comparison between USA and India with respect toPrice Fixing, the related legislations and the agencies dealing with such issues in their respectivejurisdiction.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Legal case studies and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.